Conversation with Rapporteur Manfred Nowak about Hegemonic Representation and Lived Experience of the Oppressed: A Dialogue on Hegemonic Theory and Practice on Oppressed Representation in Global Human Rights or Between Immorality and Morality- Dr.Suryaraju Mattimalla, Why I Am Not Indian: The Untouchable Rejecting India's Citizenship
To
the oppressed, and to those who suffer with them and fight at their side- Pedagogy
of the oppressed, Paulo Freire
The
so-called global human rights students, experts, theorists, scholars, and icons
never work with the oppressed. Those are black-skin, white-masked, or janus-faced
global human rights experts- Why I Am Not Indian: The
Untouchable Rejecting India's Citizenship, Dr.Suryaraju Mattimalla
Kathmandu School of Law[i] is a socially corrupted, purely conservative Brahmin’s law school run
and studied by black-skinned, white-masked Hindu-Brahmin castes and their
agents in law and human rights.
Dr.Suryaraju
Mattimalla, Why I Am Not Indian: The
Untouchable Rejecting India's Citizenship
Philosopher Paulo Freire, the
leading philosopher, educator, thinker, theorist, and dream seeker of the
oppressed human status in human history, has been an organic intellectual
throughout his life, from birth to death, working with the most marginalized
communities, even though he is a Christian by faith. His Christian
faith made him work with the most oppressed communities, even at the cost of
his persecution. He never enjoyed a lavish life like the way our UNO and Global
Human Rights experts enjoy a lavish life. In fact, they (The UNO or Global
Human Rights Experts) have never been threatened by any group, community, religion,
or people since they are very much part and parcel of deep-rooted conservative
ideologies at home. Their global ideologies are very much conservative
ideologies, unlike our own Paulo Freire or me. We are persecuted individuals
speaking boldly about the massive corruption of our global human rights system.
You can’t represent the oppressed if you are not oppressed. If you are a member
of a traditional hegemony such as Hindu, Muslim, Jain, Sikh, Buddhist, Parsi,
White, or Christian, you are completely unfit to teach any human rights
locally, regionally, nationally, or internationally. Only untouchable castes,
sexual minorities, Africans, and Yazidis are eligible categories to teach or
represent human rights locally, regionally, nationally, and internationally.
Thank you.
My dear fellow untouchable castes, sexual
minorities, Africans, Yazidis, and black-skinned people, let me declare to you
that only victims will fight for their human status, identity, rights, freedom,
liberty, equality, and fraternity, and traditional tormentors or transgressors
will never fight for our rights even though they are calling themselves human
rights experts, law experts, democratic experts, etc. in the past or present in
our times. But transgressors are omnipresent and omnipotent in every field by
occupying our spaces, identities, development, representation, etc. They are
becoming our representatives on global platforms. We don't realize they are our
representatives until we open their websites, personal histories, or newspapers
because they have historically been our tormentors who never work with us,
never meet us, never contact us, and never even know our standpoint,
ideologies, identities, faces, communities, or groups but are representing our
communities globally.
Our Franz Fanon called them black-skin white masks,
and Gopal Guru called them Janus faces. They are also called chameleons and
parasites. They have many avatars. They can penetrate every ideology without
having any personal experience, like Ravi Prakash Vyas, Prof. (Dr.) Yubaraj
Sangroula, Prof. Geeta Pathak Sangroula, and Prof. Kapil Shrestha. They are human
rights representatives on global human rights forums and UNO representatives of
international human rights, ambassadors of peace, etc., whereas they are also
members of Hindu terrorist organizations locally, regionally, and nationally.
For example, Ravi
Prakash Vyas[ii],
a hardcore Hindu Brahmin, is a Program Coordinator, Master of Human Rights and
Democratization (Asia-Pacific) or APMA, and representative of global human
rights on global human rights forums, whereas he is also a notorious follower
of Hindu terrorist organizations such as The Rashtriya Swayamsevak
Sangh or RSS, The Bharatiya Janata Party or BJP, The
Vishva Hindu Parishad or VHP, and a strong follower of Narendra Modi, the
present Prime Minister of India. Mr. Narendra Modi is India's current Hitler
and a hardline Hindu jingoist like any RSS, VHP, or BJP. Ravi Prakash Vyas is a
Hindu jingoist like Prof. (Dr.) Yubaraj Sangroula, Prof. Geeta Pathak
Sangroula, and Prof. Kapil Shrestha, who are also human rights experts on
global platforms but hardcore Hindutvas locally, regionally, and nationally in
Nepal. As I have been writing here, these black-skin, white masks of hardcore
Hindu-Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya, and Shudra castes have two faces. Locally,
they are hardcore Hindus, whereas globally they are global human rights
experts. They are representing our communities on global human rights
platforms. We don’t even know that these guys are our representatives and are
talking and speaking about us.
Everything is a black-skin and
white mask of these hardcore or softcore Hindu Brahmins and their agents
with law degrees. Of course, global human rights organizations, the United
Nations, the European Union, and Western powers strongly support these black
skins and white masks because hegemonic white masculinities and femininities
also represent LGBTQ people, Africans, untouchables, and Yazidis without any
lived experience. We don’t even know that we don’t know what is happening in
human rights fields across the globe because global human rights study centers
are selecting only hegemonic castes, religions, clans, ethnic groups, genders,
and races to represent us with full-pledged scholarships. All of these global
human rights study centers are run by hegemonic white/Brahmins/Khans/Mahveers/Buddhas/hegemonic
masculinities and femininities etc with black-skin and white mask ideologies,
which is a form of corruption. Their only aim is to destroy or to keep us
permanently in our traditional spaces, and they want our permanent status quo
in social, cultural, and educational fields. religious and gender orders.
The Global Campus Human Rights
Study Center or the European Master Program (EMA)[iii] in Human Rights and Democratization has been running its EMA (Human
Rights and Democratization) for a long time, but it never had a space for LGBTQ
identities on its online application form till I achieved it. EMA is run by
so-called global human rights experts who are hegemonic masculinities and
femininities. They never think there is also a category called "sexual
minorities", so you have to choose either male or female without any democratic
space on the EMA application form till I jump into the matter. I managed to add
a space for our community. You can see my email communication with the EMA
program to add a space for our LGBTQ community on their EMA online application
form. I am the champion of achieving a space for our community on EMA human
rights and democratization. Why did I only work hard to achieve this space? Why
not let the other hundreds of so-called human rights students pass and graduate
with their EMA degrees and globally renowned researchers and professors work
and teach in this EMA Global Human Rights and Democratization program, but they
never add a space for us?
You have to choose only one male
or female on their application form. Why not them because they don’t have lived
experience but only theoretical experience in the language of English. I doubt
they have any theoretical or practical experience with representation and lived
experience. Why me only? Because I am a sexual minority, untouchable, and
dark-skinned, I knew the pain and suffering, whereas these black-skinned, white
masks don’t know our pain and suffering, so they never add space for our
community except to represent us globally. How can a person represent
untouchables, sexual minorities, slaves, African Americans, and Yazidis without
having personal experience? But our global eminent human rights expert, Manfred
Nowak, says he can represent anyone without personal experience. There are
millions of Manfred Nowak's in the human rights field, so human rights are
falling in our times. Let me reiterate that whites, Brahmins, Hindus, Muslims,
Sikhs, Parsis, Buddhists, Jains, Christians, hegemonic masculinities and
femininities, are unfit to teach human rights. If they want to study human
rights, then let them study human rights without any scholarships or
fellowships. But any human rights scholarships or fellowships should be awarded
to untouchables,
sexual minorities, Africans, and Yazidis unconditionally to achieve targeted
human rights locally, regionally, nationally, and globally. Human rights at the
United Nations or the European Union have failed because local, regional,
national, and international human rights bodies are run by hegemonic castes,
religions, genders, clans, and ethnocentric people. They are chameleons and
parasites.
People like Ravi Prakash
Vyas or his father or his Nepali friends or hegemonic communities from
Asia-Pacific are studying human rights because they have scholarships, so they
are becoming overnight human rights icons by oppressing the most vulnerable
castes, clans, genders, blacks, sexual minorities locally, regionally, and
nationally. Any Brahmin or Khan or Buddha or Mahabir or Hindu or Muslim or Sikh
or Jain or Parsi or Christian or white should not be selected for any
scholarship to study human rights or peace studies or justice or gender
studies. Let them study with the wealth that they corrupted traditionally by
using their hegemonic caste, religion, race, clan, ethnicity, and gender
identities. Trust me or not, if there was no scholarship, then none of the
Brahmins or their agents would opt for human rights. Everything is free of
charge globally. Why are they not choosing human rights programs in India or
Nepal because they know that they can’t become an icon of human rights in front
of real victims such as untouchables, sexual minorities, Africans, or Yazidis? We
all know the brutal face of these Hindu-Brahmins' human rights and
democratization ideology.
Did you have at least untouchables, sexual
minorities, Africans, and Yazidis in your family? Who are your
parents? Did you have at least one untouchable, sexual minority, African, or
Yazidi parent? Is your girlfriend or boyfriend untouchable, sexual minorities, Africans,
Yazidis? Did you marry untouchables, sexual minorities, Africans, Yazidis Etc Let me tell you one last thing: all these
Asian-Pacific human rights icons are dowry takers from their traditionally
married wives and husbands. Giving and taking dowry are crimes, happily
practiced by these notorious human rights icons. They marry their caste, clan,
race, and religious people traditionally by taking millions of dollars in
currency and wealth. All these Asia-Pacific human rights icons are part and
parcel of open, brutal, and systematic violence, corruption, fraud, cheating,
and lying across the globe. People like Ravi Prakash Vyas, who
is a Hindu jingoist like Prof. (Dr.) Yubaraj Sangroula[iv], Prof. Geeta Pathak
Sangroula[v], and Prof. Kapil Shrestha[vi], are cheating the
global community and enjoying taxpayers' money in the name of human rights. One
should conduct a lie detector test to know about their real faces of tradition,
multiple conservative identities, Janus faces, and black-skin and white mask
faces.
Please go through my below email conversation between me and EMA
(European Master of Arts) Global Human Rights School (Human Rights and
Democratization) to know about my work to add space for sexual minorities in
their online application form. I don’t know now whether they erased that space
or carried my spirit.
Brahmins or their Hindu agents are using their traditional hegemonic
caste identity to occupy social respect, dominance, hegemony, and material,
personal, and political benefits locally, regionally, and nationally, whereas
they are using same identities plus human rights ideology to gain international
notoriety, fame, and wealth. They are using social identity to dominate in
India and the world with their caste identity, such as Brahmin, Pundit, or
human rights identity, for both local and global domination. They seem
like true human rights experts but are very hard-core conservatives in their
everyday life. Human rights are not their real face. Hindutva is their true
face.
Finally, let me ask you, Mr. Manfred Nowak[vii], Are
you morally or ethically fit to teach or represent the oppressed without having
had any lived or personal experience or without working with them locally? Did
you have a lived experience like Paulo Freire, who spent
his whole life with the oppressed? We know that you are not an organic
intellectual. Hence, we are dismissing you from representing the oppressed
since you do not have any lived experience with social oppression, gender
oppression, religious oppression, or cultural oppression. Sorry, Mr., but I am
rejecting your attempts to repress me in any space or platform. If you have
moral guts or ethical guts, please stop representing us. Thank you.
Ref:
http://dalitacademicmafia.blogspot.com/2022/07/ravi-prakash-vyas-future-nobel-peace.html
http://dalitacademicmafia.blogspot.com/2022/07/the-black-skin-white-masks-or-janus.html
https://dejazamtchnegussebezabih.blogspot.com/2022/07/ravi-prakash-vyas-future-nobel-peace.html
https://dejazamtchnegussebezabih.blogspot.com/2022/07/the-black-skin-white-masks-or-janus.html
|
Tue, Dec 22, 2020,
11:17 PM |
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
I have submitted my EMA application
successfully. However, the EMA online application does not provide an option
for LGBTQ applicants like me to write their gender under the category of
gender, except following the traditional identities such as male or female. I
have opted for "male" since there is no choice. Hence, I would like
to request to add "other" in the gender category so that LGBTQ
applicants like me can choose "other" under the category of
"gender".
Thank you, EO. Daniela, for your
yesterday's reply about this. However, I feel that the Secretary and the
Director of the Global Human Rights Program should know about this, so I am
just emailing them too, along with you.
Thank you.
EMA Candidate Dr. Surya 3008
|
Wed, Dec 23, 2020, 1:13 AM |
|
||
|
||||
Dear Surya,
No problem at all, we'll add the option "Other" in the gender
category.
Again, we apologise for the inconvenience.
Kind regards,
Daniela
EMA Executive Officer
P. +39 041 2720 921
ema.secretariat@gchumanrights.org
Monastery of San Nicolò
Riviera San Nicolò, 26
I-30126 Venice Lido, VE
P. +39 041 2720911
gchumanrights.org
|
Wed, Dec 23, 2020, 2:33
AM |
|
||
|
||||
Thank you EO Daniela for your kind
and positive reply that you will be adding the "other" to the online
application. I hope to see the other applications soon.
I am sorry for my request to add my
gender.
Thank you once again for your
inclusiveness in practice.
I am thanking you on behalf of my
community.
Kind regards
Dr. Surya
|
Thu, Jan 14, 2021, 1:39 AM |
|
||
|
||||
Dear Surya,
If you select the option (...) you
can then write "LGBTQ person" or any other definition you like.
Kind regards,
Daniela
EMA Executive Officer
P. +39 041 2720 921
ema.secretariat@gchumanrights.org
Monastery of San
Nicolò
Riviera San Nicolò, 26
I-30126 Venice Lido,
VE
P. +39 041 2720911
|
Jan 14, 2021, 2:23 AM |
|
||
|
||||
Thank you EO Daniele for your kind
information. I have already resubmitted my application by choosing a space.
Thank you very much for establishing a space and identity for sexual minorities
in the prestigious EMA application.
Kind regards
Dr. Surya
|
Tue, Jan 5, 2021, 10:52 PM |
|
||
|
||||
Dear Global Experts, Professor
Manfred Nowak, George Ulrich, Alice Gould, and EO Daniela in Human Rights
I have a query about scholars or
human rights writers who are writing and publishing on sexual minority issues
without having personal or lived experience. I read and contacted some human
rights writers or human rights scholars about LGBTQ issues and came to know
that they belong to traditional or mainstream genders. They do not have any
personal or lived experience with LGBTQ people or as LGBTQ in their lifetime. I
appreciate their academic scholarship and theoretical writings on LGBTQ rights
and life. Their writings are without a doubt the best academic writings, and
their scholarship in human rights discourses is the best academic scholarship.
I respect them a lot. However, my question is, can the mainstream genders
represent sexual minorities in academic discourses or human rights discourses,
or can they represent them in policy-making without lived experience? Can they
capture what humiliation means, torture means, persecution means, or rape means
when they are thinking or writing or representing on behalf of sexual
minorities on international platforms? Can anyone represent sub-subalterns like
LGBTQ or Dalits/Untouchables or women or Jews without having lived experience
of these groups? Can a person of the mainstream gender think, speak, or write
on behalf of LGBTQ people in human rights discourse despite having no personal
experience? I am sorry for my query, but I want to know whether it is an
ethical issue not to represent LGBTQ people. I want to know how much a
mainstream or traditional gender without any lived experience can capture the
humiliation, torture, or persecution of LGBTQ people when they are thinking,
writing, or policy-making. Thank you. Kind regards Dr. Surya
|
Jan 6, 2021, 1:40 AM |
|
||
|
||||
Dear Dr Sura,
the global human rights movement, and
the Global Campus of Human Rights as part of it, is a joint and united movement
to fight for inclusive, tolerant and diverse societies and against all forms of
discrimination and exclusion. It would be a major mistake to split the global
human rights movement into many different sectors and silos by letting only
LGBTIQ people fight for LGBTIQ rights, only persons with disabilities fight for
the rights of persons with disabilities, only migrants and refugees fight for the
rights of migrants and refugees, only women fight for women's human rights,
only black people fight for the rights of Africans, only members of minorities
and indigenous peoples fight for their specific group rights, only children
fight for children's rights, only the elderly fighting for the rights of older
persons etc.
It was very important that white
people joined the fight against slavery, colonialism and against racism in the
US or against apartheid in South Africa, that men joined the global women's
rights movement, that straight people joined the movement for LGBTIQ rights and
that we all stand up for the human rights of others, and not primarily for our
own human rights. I am myself a highly privileged white straight European male,
but I nevertheless feel that I should have the right to be part of the global
human rights movement fighting against discrimination of all kinds and on all
grounds. When I signed, together with other experts, of all sexual orientations
and gender identities, the Yoyakarta Principles, I was bombarded with even more
hate mails (usually from straight men) than when I campaigned for the closure
of the Guantanamo Bay detention facilities. When I did that, I did not have the
feeling that I was speaking on behalf of the LGBTIQ community, I was speaking
as a member of the joint global human rights movement. As UN Special Rapporteur
on Torture, I interviewed thousands of torture survivors in all regions of our
planet, of all colours, religions and gender identities. I can assure you that
the physical and mental sufferings, the humiliations and assaults on the core
of human dignity of torture victims feel very much the same for all human
beings, irrespective of their different identities. That is why I believe that
we all have the same human dignity and should, therefore, enjoy the same
universal human rights.
I hope that I answered your question.
With my best wishes for a more
promising New Year
Manfred Nowak
|
Jan 6, 2021, 2:57 AM |
|
||
|
||||
Dear Eminent Professor Manfred
Nowak:
Thank you so much indeed for your
elaborate explanation of my query.
Historically, white western
ideologies are based on human equality, dignity, rights, civil rights, human
progress, and peacebuilding. The writings of India's philosophers,
intellectuals, writers, and human rights activists range from Socrates to the
present-day Habermas, Michael Foucault, Gramsci, Derrida, Hannah Ardent, Marx,
and the Global Campus for Human Rights. I never doubt the "white man's
burden" to civilize the world, even at the cost of their lives. Tens of
millions of whites have lost their lives to achieve civil rights for African
Americans in the USA. Millions of white men lost their lives protecting Jews
from the Nazis. Until today, they have been standing with them in western
societies. Millions of white men and women have sacrificed their lives for the
sake of a just society where "touchable and untouchable";
"sexually dominant and sexually minorities"; and "whites and
non-whites" can go together. If Global Campus for Human Rights is run by
Asians, Africans, or Muslims, I could not even dare to approach EMA. You can
understand how much I read about white men's burdens and their philosophies to
achieve a just human society where discrimination is well-established. From
Socrates to today's EMA, people have been spending their stamina to achieve a
fair society where there is no place for oppression. Since I came from
"walking carrion status" from my birth till today, I have had this
query but have not suspected any discourses from western societies or western
thinking heads. At least I am breathing in India or Ethiopia because I know
that there are western people to bear my burden, suffering, pain, humiliation,
violence, and vulnerability. Like me, there are at least a billion people from
Asia, Africa, and the Muslim world who are living with little hope because they
know that western people are there to give them life. The West is a lifeline of
oxygen to hundreds of millions of people who are at high risk of various
socio-cultural-religious repressive ideologies in non-western societies. There
is no doubt that if there are no white men and white women, there is no human
equality. I came from an Asian model of society and experienced the African
mode of society, so I know what slavery means, what discrimination means, and
what violence means because I was born with it, grew up with it, and lived with
it because my forefathers were born with it and died with it without
experiencing what human status means. We are sub-humans in traditional
societies. We are discriminated against from birth till death. Even our dead
bodies also carry humiliation (in the case of untouchables in Asia). It is the
same with Dalit men in the LGBTQ community since they face double
discrimination for their status in caste as well as their gender. Dalit women
and LGBTQ people face triple discrimination in Asia. If the British or
Europeans did not bring modernity through English education to Asia, half a
billion untouchable lives, another half a billion women's lives, and millions
of LGBTQ people's lives were left to the mercy of well-established traditional
ideologies. We are slaves in India from our birth to death to the hegemonic
groups. I would have remained a slave if white western colonizers had not come
to India. My great grandfather used to tell my father that for the first time
he was wearing a "white dress" because of the British rulers in
India. Otherwise, untouchables are not permitted to wear white, are not
permitted to wear shoes, and are not permitted to drink water from public taps
in India. My grandfather told us the same thing. My father experienced western
modernity, and I experienced it. We will be eternally grateful to the white
minds of the West. We are always indebted to white men and women without any
doubt.
Thank you, Professor, for your deep
explanation of my query.
Dr. Surya
