SHAMING THE SHAMELESS NON-MERITORIOUS RESEARCH SCHOLARS

It is time to bring many realities about reservation holders who are studying higher education in Indian universities, particularly reservation holders of Scheduled Castes (SCs) or so-called Dalits who are studying for their M.Phil or Ph.D, including university faculties from mainstream Dalit communities such as the Mahar, Mala, or Parayar castes.This is my personal experience with these reservation holders at various Indian universities. So I strongly believe that my personal experiences can bring realities of SC research-students, teachers and their non-meritorious politics in the name of caste. But it is also the case of the way in which SC students, scholars, researchers, and teachers do caste politics to escape from knowledge creation. They are waiting for a cause to get personal benefits, such as the deaths of reservation holders in any name on university hostels or the rejection of M.Phil or PhD research to be guided by the touchable communities.

 

I am drawing attention to my lived experience with the so-called followers of Ambedakr on the campuses of the University of Hyderabad (UoH), Pondicherry University (PU), Babasaheb Dr. Ambedkar National Institute of Social Sciences (BANISS) and Jamia Milia Islamia (JMI), where I studied and discontinued due to the harassment of Ambedkar followers who are non-meritorious in academics. Of course, I am an inter-caste born Pooja Yadav-Dalit-Christian scholar.

 

I read many writings by the classical thinker of Telugu literature, Gurram Jashuva, who created enormous knowledge on the issues of untouchability even though he never belonged to the caste of mainstream Dalit. He was born to Madiga-Pooja-Yadav-Christian parents in one of the non-meritorious South Asian Indian villages. But the way he created knowledge is unchallengeable despite his Madiga-Yadav-Christian poverty background. He used his writings to challenge Hindu society and defeated many orthodox Hindu Brahmins with his powerful writings. So his intellectual writings have brought Brahmins to his feet, but he never begs for reservations like the way India’s 98% of people beg. He is not a politician like Gandhi or Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, nor is he a rural landlord who knows violence, but he believed in knowledge where there was no representation for the Untouchables. My Pooja-Yadav mother-SUGUNA YADAV used to say that how the Indian caste system has systematically spoiled the spirit of knowledge creation. She used to say further that with the entry of agriculture castes, Vaishyas, Kshatriyas, vernacular-speaking Brahmins, along with reservation holders, the Indian academy has died.

 

There are important reasons for the lack of representation of Untouchables, Tribes, Agriculture castes, Vaishyas, Kshatriyar and vernacular speaking Brahmins, because:

 

These above-mentioned groups never believe in reading texts.

 

They never have the habit of reading or writing.

 

They are accustomed to manipulations based on lies.

 

They never know the meaning of ethics in everyday life.

 

They have been living a life of lies, manipulations, unethical living, and dishonesty for the last 6000 years.

 

So there is no difference between a vernacular-speaking Brahmin or a Dalit-Mala-Mahar-Parayar in terms of manipulations. They are accustomed to a life of getting fruit without doing any hard work. For example, a non-meritorious reservation holder pursuing a PhD in Sciences recently committed suicide.When the university suspended him based on his violent behavior towards another student who also belonged to a non-meritorious organization in the realm of knowledge creation, it became a national issue with the sympathy of the non-meritorious reservation holders. They have disturbed an entire Indian's precious time in the name of caste. Many Chief Ministers and politicians have visited the university and supported the non-meritorious reservation holders who have been blocking the university since the day of the suicide. Now their demands are indirect:

 

We do violence, but you should not take any action.

 

If you take action, we will blame you in the name of caste.

 

We want free degrees without studying or without writing exams or theses.

 

We want to teach at premier medical, engineering, social sciences, and sciences institutions such as IITS, IIMS, central or state universities, and so on, but you should not expect us to speak in English after 30 years of service.

 

We want M.Phil, Ph.D degrees, and finally, faculty positions without even knowing the spelling of Rousseau or Derrida. This is the fate of the Indian academy.

 

Let us ban student organizations from the knowledge creation centers in any form.

 

Let us fight for knowledge creation.

 

Let us save the universities from the hands of reservation holders, agricultural castes, vaishyas, kshatriyas, and vernacular-speaking Brahmins.

 

Let us save knowledge creation from the hands of politicians.

 

Let us fight for a creamy layer among the SC and ST groups like OBC.

 

Jawaharlal Nehru University has become another Maharwada or Malawada with the entry of non-meritorious-reservation holders as well as joining with the support of politicians.

 

Restrictions should be prohibited at the research and teaching levels of higher education.

 

CASTE POLITICS IN THE NAME OF SUICIDE SHOULD BE BANNED.

 

SHAMING THE SHAMELESS CREATURES WHO JOIN UNDER THE RESERVATIONS, POLITICAL RECOMMENDATIONS, OR BRIBE BUT NEVER PRODUCE KNOWLEDGE EVEN THOUGH THEY RECEIVE HANDSOME SALARIES AND BENEFITS.

 

Let us ban reservations in premier academic institutions.

DALIT ACADEMIC MAFIA: DEATH OF MERIT

DALIT ACADEMIC MAFIA: DEATH OF MERIT: I have come across many non-Brahmin students and research students committing suicides on the campuses of colleges and universities in I...

DEATH OF MERIT

I have come across many non-Brahmin students and research students committing suicides on the campuses of colleges and universities in India. It is surprising to listen that they are being humiliated by the caste Hindus in the name of caste or merit. I have seen many dead bodies that died for the sake of this so-called humiliation in the name of merit or caste. But nowhere had I seen a Brahmin is getting suicide due to racial discrimination in the west by deriving my attention from the Australian experience. I met many Indians in Sydney when I was studying Human Rights course from the Sydney University in 2011. Every Indian Hindu started saying white people are discriminating them because they are not meritorious, because they are cheap labour. I met many Indian Hindu doctors and software Engineers who are working in the agricultural fields, petrol banks, roads, barber shops, university canteens and car wash companies, hotels as cleaners for $4, 8, 10, 15, 20, and 30 per hour. Every Indian Hindu say that they are not getting respect from the white people, they are not getting rented rooms in white towns, they are not allowed to stay in the white streets but black towns on par with the other Asians and Africans. Black towns are the places where Asians and Africans live. There is a reason for this that rents are cheap in this locality and they are belongs to same ghetto people from the subcontinent with peculiar cultural and religious behaviours. For instance I stayed at the Sydney University Village (SUV) at the Sydney University in White Town by paying $400 per week in my studio apartment. Of course there is a clear cut discrimination not based on race but based on religion. I had seen how an African from Uganda is being treated differently from the same African from Uganda who was a Muslim so same with Christian from India with Hindu. As a matter of fact Hindus and Muslims or Buddhists or Sikhs never get equal treatment on par with the Christian from any society in the white western society.

Jewish teachers are in love with Indian Hindu Brahmins for only one reason that both share superstitions and blind beliefs. Moreover Jewish are isolated from the public sphere in Australia not because they are inferior race like Untouchables of India/Asia but because they are most unscientific and most inhuman community unlike Untouchables of Asia who believes in Science and Technology. Another reason is that no Hindu Brahmin get rented rooms in the white town so with the Jewish that stay in the Jewish ghettos like Asian Hindus in black ghettos unlike Asian Christians who stay in white towns in Australia. So Asian/African Hindus or Muslims who have been staying in white western Christian countries with lots of humiliation in the name of non-merit, inferior race, black/yellow race, short race, and cheap labour, funny cultural people but never ever go for suicide despite their everyday humiliation in the hands of scientifically superior races or religion.

So there are many examples to say that how Indian Hindus or Muslims are living with everyday humiliation in civilized Christian societies in the name of most non-meritorious and intellectually inferior races but they never go for any suicide. So what is the problem with Indian sub-subaltern castes who commit suicide in the name of caste based discrimination or merit? Can’t they survive in the country in which they born when their fellow Indian Hindus are living in white western Christian countries with more than humiliations that they are carrying the same way India’s Untouchables are carrying in India? What is difference between humiliated Indian Hindu communities in white western Christian societies and Untouchables in India in facing humiliation? Why India’s Untouchables are committing suicide when their fellow Hindus are living happily with the same humiliation at the hands of whites in white western Christian societies?

I understood from my lived experience in Brazil and Australia that Hindus or Jewish or Muslims or Sikhs or Buddhists or Jain community people are living in white western Christian societies by facing humiliation everyday whereas Untouchables are not able to bare this everyday humiliation but except committing suicide. Committing suicide is misguiding people in any aspect. Life is a challenge so one should challenge the life to live productively instead of committing suicide. Hindus are living in Christian societies without producing any knowledge so same with Muslims why not Untouchables who carry the spirit of Hinduism in every aspect? A student committing suicide or anyone in that sense is a nonsense and unproductive. Let us not think about suicide but challenge the well established cultures, traditions, ideologies, theories and practices by producing knowledge an alternative knowledge.

RELIGIOUS FAITH AS A THREAT OF HUMAN GROWTH IN ASIA

I want to write on this application of reason in everyday aspect of life, has come from my observation with the Chief Minister of Telangana who belonged to an intellectually inferior ‘agrarian’ caste Velama from South Asian state of India. Chief Minister had organized many Yajnas before it, so it’s not his first Yajna and not his last Yajna. Recently he had conducted some unscientific, irrational and meaningless Hindu religious Yajnas for Telangana region for which President of India along with other state and central ministers including people from the legal sectors, university teachers alike have attended and praised his Yajnas for the development of Telangana. Government is spending millions of dollars on this unscientific religious Yajnas and according to sources on estimation of expenses on this religious event is that the Government of Telangana had spent Rs.7 crores in Indian currency but it is beyond that estimation. It is stunning news for any person who believes in application of reason or science but question comes who are Progressive intellectuals in India or Afghanistan or China. It is really reminded my old days with schools, colleges and universities in various parts of india.

I started reminding my school days and college days even university days where senior Professors and Vice Chancellors do Saraswati pooja for knowledge along with celebrating other Hindu religious poojas at various occasions. Teachers and students are very active in religious celebrations particularly at the schools, colleges and universities. I have started observed why these school teachers and college lecturers were and university teachers are so involved in this kind of irrational religious celebrations on the educational premises.

I used to read that Dr Samaram and his family members are so progressive and rationales so I had visited their Hospital where I met few white western rationales. I found M K Gandhi photo inside of his NGO. It’s again stunned and shocked me. Because Dr Samaram or his family members are progressive right from his Father but after seeing Hero Worship of Gandhi and his so-called freedom movement I had realized that it’s very difficult to define who are rationals and who are irrationals in the context of India. So the same with other rationales who were shot dead by extreme Hindutva forces in western India and south India. It is same with so-called literary figures who returned their awards to the government in the name of NO FREEDOM OF SPEECH & NO SECURITY FOR THE LIVES OF INTELLECTUALS. I do agree that religious intolerance is well established in India right from the 6000 years so where is the question of tolerance in subcontinent. Most of so-called intellectuals with the exceptional cases of Internationally Renowned Historian Romila Thapar who rejected Government of India’s award by saying that “I only accept awards from the academic institutions or those associated with my professional works” unlike Thapar had turned down the Padma Bhushan on an earlier occasion — in 1992. To the President, she explained the reason for turning down the award thus: "I decided some years ago that I would only accept awards from academic institutions or those associated with my professional work, and not accept state awards." Thapar had turned down the Padma Bhushan on an earlier occasion — in 1992. To the President, she explained the reason for turning down the award thus: "I decided some years ago that I would only accept awards from academic institutions or those associated with my professional work, and not accept state awards."business people or political activists or Cricketers or Indian Cinema actors and actresses who bribe to get awards from the government. So corruption is a well established phenomenon in Indian culture and tradition. It has its own religious reasons which support this bribe to eliminate enemies or get into high or low offices.

I found only one reason is that they are naturally right from their birth or from the generation of 6000 years are a people without any human skills i.e lack of reasoning, rationality, scientific temper, progressive, humanity, love, care, affection, fraternity towards their living creatures in subcontinent. Why I am saying these reasons behind their hypocrisy is lies. They are born and brought up in a society which is lying based with its strong hypocrite cultural values. But I had observed white people when I was in Sydney University for my human rights studies that white western Christian society is a great society with greatest human values. I found there are massive hospitals for the animals and birds on par with the human hospitals. Any society can’t be progress unless until its science and technology does not have human, animal or bird face. I had seen white people in Sydney the way in which they love animals and birds without any discrimination. They keep pigs, dogs etc as their pet dogs unlike Indians who worship cow but they never feed cows and who hate other animals such as pig. They love pigeon but hate crow. We can’t even compare greatest west with inhuman east in terms of love, care, affection towards human or animal or bird. For civilized west black is a beauty but for the intellectually inferior Asia ‘Asian white’ is a beauty. The notion of beauty is different from white western Christian society where beauty is nothing but loving any creature unlike Indian way of self-glorification. Indian beauty is a beauty of unproductive and uncompetitive in any aspect of life.

For instance, in a society like India or Afghanistan or China there is no value for human life, animal life or birds life because religious faith is so dominant that its application of irrationality, superstitious believes and non-progressive ideas and life is determining the progress of the society with its totality of religious faiths. Application of Reason should have human face such as love, care, affection, responsibility towards every living creature otherwise society will be stagnant like India or Afghanistan or China. China, a Buddhist country, is a full of superstitions and unscitific society like its counterpart Islamic and Hindutva societies, despite of its development in economic prosperity compare to any Asian state. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar’s thesis of Buddhism is a false observation and Buddhist humanism is a myth so one should not come to conclusion that Buddhism is a scientific religion and its full of humanity by reading the works of  Ambedkar. Professor Anand Teltumbde is one of the revolutionary writer and great academic from South Asia who writes about this myth of social justice or humanity in Buddhism from the perspective of progressive knowledge and scientific research. Unfortunately non-meritorious followers of Dr B R Ambedkar who never even read Ambedkar Writings and Speeches have been followed his Buddhist Conversion blindly. They are following their meritorious Doctor in terms of Buddhism,who obtained progressive knowledge by acquiring prestigious degrees from the prestigious Christian countries The United States of America, Great Britain and Germany, without questioning the unscientific and hierarchical forms of Buddhism. If Hinduism gives a Brahmin, a priestly group religiously, at a top of the vertical hierarchy then Buddha had given a Kshatriya or ruling group religiously at the top. So Buddhism is nothing but Hinduism in terms of irrationality or unscientific way of life but this earned Doctor from the prestigious Christian universities Colombia University, London School of Economics and Bann University had misguided his ‘Mahars’ because:

He is a Hindu by heart and his family members are the faith holders of Kabirpanth

He wants a new identity which should not contradict with his ancestors religion i.e. Hinduism

He wants his Mahars to be part and parcel of Hindutva religion through this unscientific religious conversion to Buddhism (Please read Edmund Weber’s works of Ambedkar’s Buddhism). Edmund Weber is an internationally renowned religious scholar from the Germany who studied Ambedkar and his inner personal attachment with Hinduism. He knows that his community people like Hindu communities never have habit of reading a progressive book through which application of reason can come out. I can’t talk about Mohandas Karanchand Gandhi’s Hinduism because he is not a man of knowledge so I really do not like to spend my time or energy or money by focusing on his non-meritorious activities. White western society wanted to bare Gandhi on their shoulders because they are getting cheap labours from India. Indian Doctors, Software Engineers, Academicians from south India or Business groups from Gujarat or Punjab are cheap labour for the services of white western Christian society so if you look at the increase of Visas for Indians will be a valid witness for praising Gandhi for his unscientific way of life with a strong irrational religious ideology.

I had experience the life of Indian community in Australia without any respect, self-respect and dignity. I worked in a car wash company in which I saw more than 12 Indian guys who are working in that white man running car wash as cleaners. I used to work on every Saturday because my Student visa permit to work on only Saturday and Sunday so I used to work 3 hours on Saturday and used to spend that money for buying some books whereas Indian youth who are Hindus by religion are the graduates or post graduates of Medicine and Engineering degrees. They are holding student visas for a small colleges running by Indian community in Sydney but they never attend classes because as per their words that they have agreement with Indian running colleges in Australia that they won’t attend any class but work. Second agreement is that they should get degree after specific period to apply for the Permanent Residence (PR).

Generally when you are applying for a Student Visa you are promising to those Embassies that you will be coming back to your home country to serve your country with the progressive knowledge you earned from those colleges or universities from the west. But the moment you land in those Heavens on Earth you are searching for car wash companies or agricultural fields or beauty salons to earn dollars. I met many Indians with MBBS Degrees who are working in the agriculture field with their wives because per hour it carries $40 so it gives more money compared to car wash where you get $10 to $12 per hour.

Another important matter is that Indians who are going with Medical or Engineering Degrees would not become Doctors of Engineers directly but you should qualify their tests to know whether you are fit or unfit to be a Doctor or Engineer. Most of the Medical or Engineering degree holders are working in other professions because they are not able to pass that required tests conducted by white countries. It shows the pathetic condition of Indian academy at the hands of non-meritorious teachers and rulers.

He knows that India’s ‘Untouchables’ like their counterpart ‘Touchables’ never have thought process to create knowledge because they are basically coming from a lie based society which guided its people into manipulations, violence, corruption, unethical, inhuman values historically. For instance Indians glorify that they have found airplane by a sage 2000 years ago. And they claim that they are the contributors of Zero. By looking at these claims by Indian community A Cambridge University Professor Venkatraman Ramakrishan, a Nobel Laureate and a Structural Biologist who joined at the Cambridge University and who earned lot of knowledge over a period of 40 years to earn this internationally renowned non-political award NOBEL for his works. He shared it. Nobel Laureate Venkatraman Ramakrishnan refused to accept the myth of Argumentative Indians for various claims such as idea of airplane by a sage or creation of zero. A country without any strong ethics and who glorify its culture and tradition is a greater threat to human development. A country with a strong ethical values with human face with the greater principals of equality, liberty, freedom and fraternity would rule the world in terms of love, care, affection, security, prosperity etc but unfortunately Asian way of life has became threat to human progressiveness.

I find Application of Reason or Science is an essential character of any society to progress or develop. One should connect with an application of reason to progress individually or in group or as a society or nation to compete with white western modernity. Rulers from Asia or Africa are mostly beneficiaries of religious faiths because as long as people carry the ideology of religious faith in everyday life ruling communities would not bother about their regime. So as Socratese said rulers should be well educated not in the sense of India or Afghanistan or China but in the sense of west. Application of Reason should replace irrational religious faiths to enhance individual growth in terms of knowledge, skills, progressive ideas, rationality

As Socrates said a strong mind will think of greater ideas

An average mind will think about events

And weak minds will discuss about people

So greater ideas will emerge by reading progressive literature written by eminent Social Scientists or Scientists or Autobiographies from the west

Most of Asians would spend their entire life by focusing on discussions like marriage, children, property, narrow politics, caste, religious festivals, dowry etc. I have never seen an Indian or Asian reading a book on trains or flights or even in the academic institutions were supposed to read lot of literature to create knowledge. Asian or African race is backward for more than 10000 years than the white western society. You can never seen a white man without reading and writing his journal and you will never seen an Indian while reading a book written by John Rawl. Even to Indian academic, John Rawl is a new.

People who are fighting for Human Rights and Social Justice are supposed to be great readers like Dr B R Ambedkar in Asia but unfortunately they are becoming great scholars in the school of manipulations rather than school of knowledge creation like western societies. It is the pathetic condition of Indian or Asian society in terms of applying reason to their everyday life. In this application of Reason every Asian shares equal role in crushing the modernity irrespective of caste, creed, gender, region, religion etc.

Asians or Pacific’s are sharing the same standpoint on this ignoring reason to judge with their fellow Asians to prove that they are different from more different in remaining as they are as intellectually inferior societies. The countries which respected application of reason, enlightenment, renaissance, human values and ethical values are more developed historically than the countries which believed Religious Faith is the ultimatum.

Connect Application of Reason

Asian religious believes are dangerous to the humanity

Hero Worship is greater threat to human thought

Let’s educate our self from the application of reason

DALIT ACADEMIC MAFIA: DEATH OF ACADEMIC DISCOURCES

DALIT ACADEMIC MAFIA: DEATH OF ACADEMIC DISCOURCES: Why is Indian academy dead in the knowledge creation? Why most of the academicians look at you very peculiarly the moment when you talk ...

DEATH OF ACADEMIC DISCOURCES

Why is Indian academy dead in the knowledge creation? Why most of the academicians look at you very peculiarly the moment when you talk about knowledge creation in India? Why teachers and research scholars from the Science background became unscientific, irrationals, superstitious, dependents, and non-academicians, non-producers, non-meritorious and non-knowledgeable in the academic discourses in the way in which white western Christian Universities are creating knowledge in the scientific knowledge? What made Scientists so unscientific in their daily life of India? What made Social Scientists or Scientists or Mathematicians to behave like a feudal in his/her daily life? Why are the ‘agrarian’ ‘hilly’ ‘women’ ‘untouchables’ ‘business’ ‘politicians’ ‘non-English speaking Brahmins with Indian degrees’ ‘religious scholars’ have became so non-meritorious from the period of Adi-Dravidian/Dravidian/Aryan rule to present day with the exception of British rule in the subcontinent i.e 1858 to 1947? What made these communities so weak and inferiors in the knowledge creation? Why Asian or African race is so inferiors when we look at their IQ levels or having very poor skills in academic or knowledge discourses when we compare with white western Christian societies? Of course there are few exceptional cases individually (Such as internationally renowned Emeritus Professor Romila Thapar or Professor Partha Chatterjee who got western Degrees with other few intellectuals with Indian degrees) but not in group or universities or institutions which are being funded by private or public. I do exempt premier centers like CSDS, CSSS and CSCS which are striving for knowledge creation in India. Why did NO Indian with 6000 years of ‘great’ culture, history, spirituality, purity, have invented/created any theory or machine in any discipline? Why did NO Indian University or Technical institutions or medical institutions never got into the first 1000 places in the knowledge creation? What is the contribution of 6000 years of Indian spirituality which produced manipulators and corrupted? Why did Indians look at the white western Christian Universities for learning?

What is the difference between CSDS, CSSS or CSCS and private or public funding academic institutions in India in the discourses of academics? Why certain group of students from the Film and Television Institute of India (FTII) are protesting against a non-meritorious Gajendra Chauhan whom the ‘right wing Hindutva state’ has appointed as its Director? Why not other students from other public or private universities are silence about the non-meritorious teachers and Vice-Chancellors? What is the contribution of FTII to the film industry except producing few elite directors or producers who made movies by copying Hollywood movies or enjoying the popularity through feudal based media? What is the contribution of its alumni to the ‘street theater’ which represent most under-privileged categories? Can any student of any Central/State Universities question the political appointments of non-meritorious Vice-Chancellors by the Center or State governments?

I am deeply getting hurt when I am seeing the existing conditions of State and Central Universities or so-called production centers which have became merely puppets in the hands of political offices or reservations. Recently I have visited a Central University of Hyderabad in South Asia where some caste based students organizations are shouting slogans against the Vice-Chancellor of their university who is politically appointed as a Vice Chancellor of that reputed university which is reputed for its Department of Chemistry.

With curiosity, I started reading wall posters of that particular group of students regarding restriction of their community five Mala (a predominant ‘Untouchable’ caste in the state of Andhra Pradesh in terms of politics, employment and education institutions who joined under the reservations meant for them. They have occupied 15% of reservation meant for ‘Untouchable’ communities. They are predominant in economic prosperity, employment opportunities but except in the knowledge production. They are in the outside of the knowledge production process like their fellow intellectually inferior ‘agrarian’ castes to which this Vice-Chancellor of Hyderabad Central University belongs in South Asia. He is a Kamma by caste which is considered to be an intellectually inferior agricultural community in South Asia) are restricted from the University for the incident in which they have involved in a violence by beating someone who is leading the ‘right wing Hindutva student organization’ to which the current Vice Chancellor is belonged.

These five Mala students are pursuing Ph.D Degrees in various departments or centers so I wanted to know the ‘truth’ of both claims i.e. claims of Mala students regarding political conspiracy to restrict their community students from the university hostels, administration building, and that of claims of University to restrict these Mala students in the name of casteist, anti-nationals, aggressive, violence and non-academics. The Mala Student Organization has come up with new information that the present Vice-Chancellor was the main reason for restricting their community students in a decade ago when he was a Chief Warden. I have enquired the non-Mala students regarding reason for the last time banning the ten Mala Students and banning five Mala students now. They said the same reason that they are most violent and non-academic for both incidents in which same Mala students as well as present Vice Chancellor then the Chief Warden involved.

I have started enquiring about the merit or demerit of the both claims. I have spoken to some 100 students of this University belonged to Integrated, PG, Research degrees from various schools of Sciences, Mathematics, Social Sciences and Humanities. First I had enquired about the Professor Appa Rao who is a Vice Chancellor now about his academic credentials for becoming Vice Chancellor of this University. Every one said the same answer that he is a close ally of the Bharateeya Janata Party (BJP) so that he got lucky to become a Vice Chancellor of this prestigious university like Gajendra Chauhan of FTII who is intellectually inferior but got ‘luck’ to became a head of the institution.

Second enquiry is about Mala students who are active in the caste politics on the campus that most of the students said ‘these Mala students who run caste politics are academically unfit but good at manipulations’. In the both cases of Vice Chancellor or Mala students answer is same i.e both are academically inferiors and good at manipulations. Now we should think about the condition of knowledge creation at the hands of intellectually inferior teachers and research groups.

SAVE THE ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS FROM THE HANDS OF CASTEIST POLITICS AS WELL AS NON-MERITORIOUS VICE CHANCELLORS

DALIT ACADEMIC MAFIA: DALIT ACADEMIC MAFIA

DALIT ACADEMIC MAFIA: DALIT ACADEMIC MAFIA: I am a first generation Dalit-Madiga (Father’s name is Anand alias Titus born to railway employee John Mattimalla)-Yadav (Mother’s name...

DALIT ACADEMIC MAFIA: MERITORIOUS AMBEDKAR VERSUS NON-MERITORIOUS CENTER...

DALIT ACADEMIC MAFIA: MERITORIOUS AMBEDKAR VERSUS NON-MERITORIOUS CENTER...: I am thinking of writing about some non-meritorious academic social science or humanities centers and its functions in the higher educati...

DALIT ACADEMIC MAFIA: INTELLECTUALS PRACTICES VERSUS NON-INTELLECTUAL PR...

DALIT ACADEMIC MAFIA: INTELLECTUALS PRACTICES VERSUS NON-INTELLECTUAL PR...: I went to attend a workshop meant for PhD and Post-Doctoral fellowship scholars at the Center for Studies in Social Sciences (CSSS) in Ca...

DALIT ACADEMIC MAFIA: SIXTY SEVEN YEARS JEWISH KNOWLEDGE VERSUS SIX THOU...

DALIT ACADEMIC MAFIA: SIXTY SEVEN YEARS JEWISH KNOWLEDGE VERSUS SIX THOU...: As a student of History I am always eager for knowing the truth about the way in which knowledge process is taking place between perso...

SIXTY SEVEN YEARS JEWISH KNOWLEDGE VERSUS SIX THOUSAND YEARS NON-MERITORIOUS KNOWLEDGE

I went to attend a workshop meant for PhD and Post-Doctoral fellowship scholars at the Center for Studies in Social Sciences (CSSS) in Calcutta in 2009. This is a workshop where I presented a paper on "From Difference to More Difference: A Dalit-Madiga Talk Differently from the Ambedkarite Perspective" at the 6 Day Centre for Studies in Social Sciences (CSSSC)-Navajbai Ratan Tata Trust (NRTT) Annual Workshop for Doctoral and Post-Doctoral Scholars on the Theme of Inequalities and Differences, organized by the Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta between January 04 and January 09, 2009.

 

I met and saw the egalitarian practices of renowned scholars and intellectuals in this center. For the first time, I met an internationally renowned political thinker, Professor Partha Chatterji, in this workshop. I have received study materials from the CSSS prior to attending the workshop two months in advance. The material that the center had provided to invitees (PhD or Post-Doctoral Scholars) was a rare collection written by eminent social scientists. I have been reminded of what CSCS used to provide or guide its students to read the same to discuss in the classrooms when I was a student there. The CSSS had reminded me of my past days with the CSCS through its study material. I was so happy that I had earned lots of knowledge through purely intellectual discussions and debates over the period of a week. I met eminent historians Professor Tanika Sarkar of Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi and Professor Devika of the Center for Development Studies in Kerala at the same workshop.I enjoyed their presentations and discussions.

 

I had raised some inadequate debates on the way in which the ‘Bengali Badralok Academic Mafia’ had falsely written the Indian liberation struggles and their sub-subaltern histories. I was still developing my true sense of academic quality after being removed from the CSCS in 2005. Even though I began reading vast literature and spent a significant amount of time, energy, and money on my intellectual trajectories, I still possessed intellectually inferior qualities.There is no doubt that CSCS has influenced me a lot in this academic journey of knowledge creation, even though it is branded as' elite ', but it never' isolated'me except' my personal isolation with inferior complexities’ from the academic people. This is my memory of the CSCS.

 

Coming to the CSSS workshop, I saw a very peculiar incident happen that I had never seen in my entire life, with the exception of my stay at the CSCS. I have never seen that kind of ‘wonder of the world’ in this subcontinent that ‘an internationally renowned Professor Partha Chatterji was carrying a chair for a peon who was standing just beside him’.  Is it not a wonder of the world that in a society like ours, where the "power structure" is enjoyed by everyone, irrespective of caste, religion, gender, and class, is it not a wonder of the world? Can anyone expect this "progressive, liberal, and egalitarian behavior" from any Indian university in general or sub-subaltern academicians in particular?

 

Professor Partha Chatterji’s knowledge creation or egalitarian practices with students or non-student groups have emerged from his western education, unlike subcontinental learners who practice inegalitarian behavior with fellow human beings. Of course, I do agree that everyone carries some sort of hierarchy based on many visible or invisible skills, but intellectuals who are progressive are the products of western education who thrive on freedom of individuality.

 

In fact, I had a personal experience with the internationally renowned Professor of Linguistics, Noam Chomski, when he was talking to students and teachers while sitting on the lawn in Sydney. I was part of that conversation with him in 2011.

 

My personal experience with Professor Partha Chatterji, Professor Noam Chomski, Professor Gopal Guru, Professor Satish Deshpande, Professor Sharmila Rege, Professor Tanika Sarkar, Professor Tejaswini Niranjana, Professor Anand Teltumbde, Professor Gail Omvedt, Professor Perry Anderson, Professor Aloysius, and the teaching communities of CSCS, CSDS, and CSSS has been entirely egalitarian, progressive, thought-provoking, thought- How far can teachers from the Ambedkar, Marxist, or Gender School of Thought compete with the liberation attitudes of the aforementioned intellectuals in terms of at least egalitarian behavior, if not intellectual competition?How far can ‘Indian’ products be dedicated to the cause of knowledge creation for which the above intellectuals have dedicated their life span? What is the merit of the teachers at the state and central universities except using the 'non-meritorious'‘reservation cards’ or ‘caste cards’ or ‘gender cards’ or‘regional cards’ or ‘cards of race'... for instance, Dravidians’ or ‘political cards’ or' religious cards’ or' minority cards’....

 

I've seen Anthropology and Economics Professors working with one of the central universities affiliated with the Ambedkar School of Thought, the works of which are unknown in academic circles.pathetic condition of this anthropology professor is that he was a product of some foreign universities but was never able to write a single article that could be referred to by any mainstream scholar. I knew one of the PhD students belonged to some non-meritorious ‘agrarian’ community, i.e., Reddy from South Asian Central University, used to render his‘services’ to his ‘Center Director and to his Supervisors’ who belonged to sub-subaltern groups in the social realm, to get his Ph.D. degree. Finally, this non-meritorious PhD holder got into an academic institution in Bombay and got into PDF by using manipulative methods. The same student was not given admission for his inadequate academic scholarship and for his plagiaristic work in his M.Phil in the department of Political Science by the dedicated Professor from the top of the twice-born category. The same non-meritorious student was given admission into a "non-meritorious" center for the study of social exclusion and inclusive policy, and they made him a faculty member.

 

The morale of the story is that if you are academically unfit or academically inadequate, then you are being invited by the non-meritorious centers in India, but you should not be a "good reader", you should not be a "dedicated scholar," you should not be a "good humanist," you should not be a "good writer," but you should be a part and parcel of "chitchatting," "film discussions," or "cricket discussions," or "political discussions such as praising some babus". There are many restrictions on joining this group in academic institutions. If you qualify for the above requirements, then your character would not be assassinated by these non-meritorious groups. Otherwise, your character would be assassinated by these non-meritorious teachers and researchers in academic institutions. An internationally renowned intellectual, Professor Ashsh Nandi, was being harassed by these non-meritorious groups for his stand against some corrupted people coming from the ‘agrarian’ as well as the lowest rungs of society. The same group of unworthy academicians had harassed eminent Professors Surender Jodka and Satish Deshpande until they left the subcontinent's central university.Threatening an intellectual with a "caste card" is a great loss to any university in knowledge creation. This central university has lost two eminent social scientists permanently. The same non-meritorious group had restricted eminent writer Arundhati Roy from coming to attend her book release in Hyderabad, India. As Dr B R Ambedkar said, "Caste has killed the spirit of merit" in the Indian subcontinent, by looking at the above incidents in which non-meritorious teachers and researchers have been involved in harassing eminent personalities in the school of social sciences and humanities. Another eminent scholar, Dr Gundimeda Sambaiah, who holds the highest degree from a renowned university, i.e., London University, has never been a faculty member in South Indian universities just because he is an English-speaking scholar, because he is ‘producing more knowledge’ like his fellow western-educated intellectuals in the subcontinent. His current work, ‘Contemporary Dalit Politics', published by the renowned publication, Routledge, is thought-breaking, but he does not fit into this academic mafia. The failure to recruit Dr. Sambaiah in South Indian central universities represents a significant loss to knowledge creation.It is shaming the non-meritorious, shameless teachers and researchers who are surviving on the hard work of intellectuals. The second

 

experience is: I attended a talk by Ban Ki-moon, Secretary General of the United Nations Organization, on ‘Australia and the 21^st Century United Nations: Priorities for a Changing World’ at the Venue of The Great Hall, the Quadrangle, at the University of Sydney, on Thursday 8 September 2011 between 10am and 11am at the University of Sydney, Australia. I had observed a very interesting practice of Ban Ki Moon's that he was carrying his bag without any assistance from anyone, whereas if you look at any teacher or VC in the subcontinent, they are the most inegalitarian and most hymocratic in their behavior with the teaching as well as non-teaching communities.

 

I have witnessed the bourgeois practices of non-meritorious teachers and researchers at the state and central universities who treat students and peons like slaves. Treating indifferently is based on your ‘degree’ or ‘class’ or ‘caste’ or ‘gender’ or ‘region’. I have seen a non-meritorious PhD scholar from the human rights center while carrying the foot wear of ‘his Ph.D. Supervisor cum human rights orator cum Marxist scholar’. And for those services he rendered to his 'Supervisor', he received the gift of a faculty position at one of the Central Universities. Prior to his job, 'his Supervisor cum human rights orator' allowed his name to appear as a co-author in one of his EPW articles.The gift of slavery is getting a faculty position and getting high positions after securing permanent positions.

 

A state university Vice-Chancellor treats his fellow Deans, Heads and Professors as employees of his factories and the same Deans, Heads and Professors treat Associate Professors as their subordinates working in the same factories as well by Associate Professors would treat Assistant Professors in the same way they were being treated by their superior employees.

 

Then what is the relationship between the VC and his foot soldiers? Is it the relation of master and slave? In the state universities, it is the same relationship between M.Phil/Ph.D. Supervisors and their research scholars. The same research scholars would treat PG students in the same way they had been treated by their supervisors. PG students treat their UG students the same way.

 

There is no much difference between state and central universities or institutions, with a few exceptional cases with the premier institutions such as CSDS, CSSS, and CSCS in the subcontinent in reproducing cultural hierarchies and modern slavery. The

 

forms of modern slavery that have been reproduced by the state and central universities or institutions are as follows:

 

Folding hands: Deans, HODs, and professors would fold their hands in front of VCs.

UG/PG/M.Phil/Ph.D. students should fold their hands in front of their teachers.

 

Students are being treated as domestic workers.

Students are ‘drivers’ of two-wheelers or cars of teachers of the respective departments.

Students are the‘vegetable’ carriers of the teachers' homes or quarters.

Finally, students are free-paid servants till they get their M.Phil or Ph.D degrees.

 

 

But, there is a gentleman's agreement between these non-meritorious teachers and students in every university in India. The agreement is that there is a reward for serving their bosses.I have an eyewitness at a central university in south India that a so-called ‘human rights orator’ has been allowing his students to carry his shoes, but in return he is making them faculty in other academic institutions at the cost of merit. State universities are worse than central universities in terms of reproducing modern slavery.

 

The advantages of modern slavery for Indian academic institutions are as follows:

 

You will be submitting your M.Phil or Ph.D. thesis soon without any affordances such as reading or writing.

 

You will be getting positions without reading and writing.

 

Most of the non-meritorious teachers and students in the subcontinent are guilty of plagiarism. If you look, the entire M.Phil and PhD thesis of Social Sciences, Humanities, Sciences, and Mathematics from the 1950s to the present are 'copied' works full of plagiarism, but they got degrees, jobs, and retired as Professors and VCs without even writing a single page article, even for a paid journal.Indeed, my Ph.D. thesis has been checked by an anti-plagiarism checker at the university, which attested to my work as a genuine work.

 

Most of these retired professors, vice-chancellors, and even Chancellors of universities (99.99% educated in subcontinent universities) were unknown to academic circles.These non-meritorious teachers and researchers had turned state and central universities into places for chit-chat, resembling "Panchayat" or "Revenue" offices.

 

The relationship between student and teacher depends on being from the same caste or tribe. It is not easy for an outside student to become a group member of another ‘caste or tribe or religion’ teacher. Non-meritorious teachers who can't spell their liberator classical piece "Riddles of Hinduism" would refer to their "same caste student" as "maa abbayi" (he is my son), "maa ammayi" (she is my daughter), or "maa vollu" (my caste people).It is mostly being done by the non-meritorious teachers-followers of the meritorious Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in academic institutions. I had witnessed how a teacher from the state university discriminated against "her" students based on their "caste". I understood that female teachers are more ‘casteist’ rather than the ‘male’ teachers of that non-meritorious community. The Social Sciences have become centers for "chitchatting" or "uploading photos on Facebook or Whatsapp" by non-academic faculties." Egalitarian

 

practices depend on your education. If you are a product of Indian universities, your behavior will be inegalitarian with few personal exceptions, but if you are a product of renowned western universities, you will be a man of equality, liberty, freedom, and fraternity.

 

BEWARE OF NON-MERITORIOUS GROUPS ON KNOWLEDGE CENTER LANDSCAPES.

INTELLECTUALS PRACTICES VERSUS NON-INTELLECTUAL PRACTICES IN INDIAN ACADEMY

I went to attend a workshop meant for PhD and Post-Doctoral fellowship scholars at the Center for Studies in Social Sciences (CSSS) in Calcutta in 2009. This is a workshop where I presented a paper on "From Difference to More Difference: A Dalit-Madiga Talk Differently from the Ambedkarite Perspective" at the 6 Day Centre for Studies in Social Sciences (CSSSC)-Navajbai Ratan Tata Trust (NRTT) Annual Workshop for Doctoral and Post-Doctoral Scholars on the Theme of Inequalities and Differences, organized by the Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta between January 04 and January 09, 2009.

 

I met and saw the egalitarian practices of renowned scholars and intellectuals in this center. For the first time, I met an internationally renowned political thinker, Professor Partha Chatterji, in this workshop. I have received study materials from the CSSS prior to attending the workshop two months in advance. The material that the center had provided to invitees (PhD or Post-Doctoral Scholars) was a rare collection written by eminent social scientists. I have been reminded of what CSCS used to provide or guide its students to read the same to discuss in the classrooms when I was a student there. The CSSS had reminded me of my past days with the CSCS through its study material. I was so happy that I had earned lots of knowledge through purely intellectual discussions and debates over the period of a week. I met eminent historians Professor Tanika Sarkar of Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi and Professor Devika of the Center for Development Studies in Kerala at the same workshop.I enjoyed their presentations and discussions.

 

I had raised some inadequate debates on the way in which the ‘Bengali Badralok Academic Mafia’ had falsely written the Indian liberation struggles and their sub-subaltern histories. I was still developing my true sense of academic quality after being removed from the CSCS in 2005. Even though I began reading vast literature and spent a significant amount of time, energy, and money on my intellectual trajectories, I still possessed intellectually inferior qualities.There is no doubt that CSCS has influenced me a lot in this academic journey of knowledge creation, even though it is branded as' elite ', but it never' isolated'me except' my personal isolation with inferior complexities’ from the academic people. This is my memory of the CSCS.

 

Coming to the CSSS workshop, I saw a very peculiar incident happen that I had never seen in my entire life, with the exception of my stay at the CSCS. I have never seen that kind of ‘wonder of the world’ in this subcontinent that ‘an internationally renowned Professor Partha Chatterji was carrying a chair for a peon who was standing just beside him’.  Is it not a wonder of the world that in a society like ours, where the "power structure" is enjoyed by everyone, irrespective of caste, religion, gender, and class, is it not a wonder of the world? Can anyone expect this "progressive, liberal, and egalitarian behavior" from any Indian university in general or sub-subaltern academicians in particular?

 

Professor Partha Chatterji’s knowledge creation or egalitarian practices with students or non-student groups have emerged from his western education, unlike subcontinental learners who practice inegalitarian behavior with fellow human beings. Of course, I do agree that everyone carries some sort of hierarchy based on many visible or invisible skills, but intellectuals who are progressive are the products of western education who thrive on freedom of individuality.

 

In fact, I had a personal experience with the internationally renowned Professor of Linguistics, Noam Chomski, when he was talking to students and teachers while sitting on the lawn in Sydney. I was part of that conversation with him in 2011.

 

My personal experience with Professor Partha Chatterji, Professor Noam Chomski, Professor Gopal Guru, Professor Satish Deshpande, Professor Sharmila Rege, Professor Tanika Sarkar, Professor Tejaswini Niranjana, Professor Anand Teltumbde, Professor Gail Omvedt, Professor Perry Anderson, Professor Aloysius, and the teaching communities of CSCS, CSDS, and CSSS has been entirely egalitarian, progressive, thought-provoking, thought- How far can teachers from the Ambedkar, Marxist, or Gender School of Thought compete with the liberation attitudes of the aforementioned intellectuals in terms of at least egalitarian behavior, if not intellectual competition?How far can ‘Indian’ products be dedicated to the cause of knowledge creation for which the above intellectuals have dedicated their life span? What is the merit of the teachers at the state and central universities except using the 'non-meritorious'‘reservation cards’ or ‘caste cards’ or ‘gender cards’ or‘regional cards’ or ‘cards of race'... for instance, Dravidians’ or ‘political cards’ or' religious cards’ or' minority cards’....

 

I've seen Anthropology and Economics Professors working with one of the central universities affiliated with the Ambedkar School of Thought, the works of which are unknown in academic circles.pathetic condition of this anthropology professor is that he was a product of some foreign universities but was never able to write a single article that could be referred to by any mainstream scholar. I knew one of the PhD students belonged to some non-meritorious ‘agrarian’ community, i.e., Reddy from South Asian Central University, used to render his‘services’ to his ‘Center Director and to his Supervisors’ who belonged to sub-subaltern groups in the social realm, to get his Ph.D. degree. Finally, this non-meritorious PhD holder got into an academic institution in Bombay and got into PDF by using manipulative methods. The same student was not given admission for his inadequate academic scholarship and for his plagiaristic work in his M.Phil in the department of Political Science by the dedicated Professor from the top of the twice-born category. The same non-meritorious student was given admission into a "non-meritorious" center for the study of social exclusion and inclusive policy, and they made him a faculty member.

 

The morale of the story is that if you are academically unfit or academically inadequate, then you are being invited by the non-meritorious centers in India, but you should not be a "good reader", you should not be a "dedicated scholar," you should not be a "good humanist," you should not be a "good writer," but you should be a part and parcel of "chitchatting," "film discussions," or "cricket discussions," or "political discussions such as praising some babus". There are many restrictions on joining this group in academic institutions. If you qualify for the above requirements, then your character would not be assassinated by these non-meritorious groups. Otherwise, your character would be assassinated by these non-meritorious teachers and researchers in academic institutions. An internationally renowned intellectual, Professor Ashsh Nandi, was being harassed by these non-meritorious groups for his stand against some corrupted people coming from the ‘agrarian’ as well as the lowest rungs of society. The same group of unworthy academicians had harassed eminent Professors Surender Jodka and Satish Deshpande until they left the subcontinent's central university.Threatening an intellectual with a "caste card" is a great loss to any university in knowledge creation. This central university has lost two eminent social scientists permanently. The same non-meritorious group had restricted eminent writer Arundhati Roy from coming to attend her book release in Hyderabad, India. As Dr B R Ambedkar said, "Caste has killed the spirit of merit" in the Indian subcontinent, by looking at the above incidents in which non-meritorious teachers and researchers have been involved in harassing eminent personalities in the school of social sciences and humanities. Another eminent scholar, Dr Gundimeda Sambaiah, who holds the highest degree from a renowned university, i.e., London University, has never been a faculty member in South Indian universities just because he is an English-speaking scholar, because he is ‘producing more knowledge’ like his fellow western-educated intellectuals in the subcontinent. His current work, ‘Contemporary Dalit Politics', published by the renowned publication, Routledge, is thought-breaking, but he does not fit into this academic mafia. The failure to recruit Dr. Sambaiah in South Indian central universities represents a significant loss to knowledge creation.It is shaming the non-meritorious, shameless teachers and researchers who are surviving on the hard work of intellectuals. The second

 

experience is: I attended a talk by Ban Ki-moon, Secretary General of the United Nations Organization, on ‘Australia and the 21^st Century United Nations: Priorities for a Changing World’ at the Venue of The Great Hall, the Quadrangle, at the University of Sydney, on Thursday 8 September 2011 between 10am and 11am at the University of Sydney, Australia. I had observed a very interesting practice of Ban Ki Moon's that he was carrying his bag without any assistance from anyone, whereas if you look at any teacher or VC in the subcontinent, they are the most inegalitarian and most hymocratic in their behavior with the teaching as well as non-teaching communities.

 

I have witnessed the bourgeois practices of non-meritorious teachers and researchers at the state and central universities who treat students and peons like slaves. Treating indifferently is based on your ‘degree’ or ‘class’ or ‘caste’ or ‘gender’ or ‘region’. I have seen a non-meritorious PhD scholar from the human rights center while carrying the foot wear of ‘his Ph.D. Supervisor cum human rights orator cum Marxist scholar’. And for those services he rendered to his 'Supervisor', he received the gift of a faculty position at one of the Central Universities. Prior to his job, 'his Supervisor cum human rights orator' allowed his name to appear as a co-author in one of his EPW articles.The gift of slavery is getting a faculty position and getting high positions after securing permanent positions.

 

A state university Vice-Chancellor treats his fellow Deans, Heads and Professors as employees of his factories and the same Deans, Heads and Professors treat Associate Professors as their subordinates working in the same factories as well by Associate Professors would treat Assistant Professors in the same way they were being treated by their superior employees.

 

Then what is the relationship between the VC and his foot soldiers? Is it the relation of master and slave? In the state universities, it is the same relationship between M.Phil/Ph.D. Supervisors and their research scholars. The same research scholars would treat PG students in the same way they had been treated by their supervisors. PG students treat their UG students the same way.

 

There is no much difference between state and central universities or institutions, with a few exceptional cases with the premier institutions such as CSDS, CSSS, and CSCS in the subcontinent in reproducing cultural hierarchies and modern slavery. The

 

forms of modern slavery that have been reproduced by the state and central universities or institutions are as follows:

 

Folding hands: Deans, HODs, and professors would fold their hands in front of VCs.

UG/PG/M.Phil/Ph.D. students should fold their hands in front of their teachers.

 

Students are being treated as domestic workers.

Students are ‘drivers’ of two-wheelers or cars of teachers of the respective departments.

Students are the‘vegetable’ carriers of the teachers' homes or quarters.

Finally, students are free-paid servants till they get their M.Phil or Ph.D degrees.

 

 

But, there is a gentleman's agreement between these non-meritorious teachers and students in every university in India. The agreement is that there is a reward for serving their bosses.I have an eyewitness at a central university in south India that a so-called ‘human rights orator’ has been allowing his students to carry his shoes, but in return he is making them faculty in other academic institutions at the cost of merit. State universities are worse than central universities in terms of reproducing modern slavery.

 

The advantages of modern slavery for Indian academic institutions are as follows:

 

You will be submitting your M.Phil or Ph.D. thesis soon without any affordances such as reading or writing.

 

You will be getting positions without reading and writing.

 

Most of the non-meritorious teachers and students in the subcontinent are guilty of plagiarism. If you look, the entire M.Phil and PhD thesis of Social Sciences, Humanities, Sciences, and Mathematics from the 1950s to the present are 'copied' works full of plagiarism, but they got degrees, jobs, and retired as Professors and VCs without even writing a single page article, even for a paid journal.Indeed, my Ph.D. thesis has been checked by an anti-plagiarism checker at the university, which attested to my work as a genuine work.

 

Most of these retired professors, vice-chancellors, and even Chancellors of universities (99.99% educated in subcontinent universities) were unknown to academic circles.These non-meritorious teachers and researchers had turned state and central universities into places for chit-chat, resembling "Panchayat" or "Revenue" offices.

 

The relationship between student and teacher depends on being from the same caste or tribe. It is not easy for an outside student to become a group member of another ‘caste or tribe or religion’ teacher. Non-meritorious teachers who can't spell their liberator classical piece "Riddles of Hinduism" would refer to their "same caste student" as "maa abbayi" (he is my son), "maa ammayi" (she is my daughter), or "maa vollu" (my caste people).It is mostly being done by the non-meritorious teachers-followers of the meritorious Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in academic institutions. I had witnessed how a teacher from the state university discriminated against "her" students based on their "caste". I understood that female teachers are more ‘casteist’ rather than the ‘male’ teachers of that non-meritorious community. The Social Sciences have become centers for "chitchatting" or "uploading photos on Facebook or Whatsapp" by non-academic faculties." Egalitarian

 

practices depend on your education. If you are a product of Indian universities, your behavior will be inegalitarian with few personal exceptions, but if you are a product of renowned western universities, you will be a man of equality, liberty, freedom, and fraternity.

 

BEWARE OF NON-MERITORIOUS GROUPS ON KNOWLEDGE CENTER LANDSCAPES.

 

 

 

 

MERITORIOUS AMBEDKAR VERSUS NON-MERITORIOUS CENTER FOR AMBEDKAR STUDIES

I am thinking of writing about some non-meritorious academic social science or humanities centers and its functions in the higher education institutions and universities in South Asia. I am writing it purely from my personal experiences with the various teaching and research communities who are running those centers non-meritoriously in the Social Sciences. They are:

Center for the Study of Social Exclusion and Inclusive Policy (CSSE&IP)

Center for Women Studies (CWS)

Center for Ambedkar Studies (CAS)

Center for Gandhi Studies (CGS)

Center for Tribal Studies (CTS)

Center for Human Rights Studies (CHRS)

Center for Gender Studies (CGS)

Center for Dalit & Minority Studies (CDMS)

Center for Islamic Studies (CIS)

It does not mean that departments of various disciplines in the higher education institutions and universities are filled with meritorious teaching and research communities. They are in fact same on par with the above centers in spoiling the spirit of academic discourses. Academic centers have become more centers for chitchatting with the same ‘caste’ teachers, scholars and students.

The University Grants Commission (UGC) has declared that Gautham Buddha (He is politically being added by the academic mafia of Mahars), Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar and Jawaharlal Nehru (He is politically being added by then Congress regime at the center) have influenced the Indian society from their life and struggles so UGC has decided to set up centers at the universities in India. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and Dr. B. R. Ambedkar were the genuine figures in this list of great personalities who changed the Indian society from their struggles (M K Gandhi and Dr B R Ambedkar) and knowledge ( Dr B R Ambedkar). If M K Gandhi was succeeded in politics then Dr. B. R. Ambedkar has created enormous knowledge in the areas of history, politics, geography, human rights, sociology, economics, religious studies apart from his ground breaking struggles against caste system which created Untouchables in subcontinent. Arundhati Roy’s introduction for Ambedkar’s Annihilation of Caste with The Doctor and the Saint - can give you massive information about the way in which Ambedkar’s followers and M K Gandhi were fighting for the rights of ‘privileged’ groups. If M K Gandhi argued for the rights of PASSENGER INDIANS (Mostly high class and come from the so called purified castes) by ignoring the pathetic condition of INDENTURED INDIANS (Low class with low caste back ground) in South Africa then Ambedkar followers in the Center are resenting non-Mahar (Maharashtra), non-Parayar (Tamil Nadu) and non-Mala (Andhra Pradesh & Telangana) groups in subcontinent. Indeed, Ambedkar had organized meetings with his ‘mahar’ groups from the beginning. Eleanor Zelliot’s Dr B R Ambedkar and Mahar Movement was the best example so witness his ‘mahar movement’ in which it strict to ‘mahar’ community. (Ironically, non-meritorious teachers and researchers of Center for Ambedkar studies resent the Madiga Studies for arguing against the Justice studies that have been taken by the non- Mahar, non- Parayar and non- Mala academicians in the meritorious  studies of the university centers and departments).

There are few namesake non-mahars in his life but they are not countable. So the chain of resenting most marginalized sections can be seen in the works of M K Gandhi or Dr. B.  R. Ambedkar. But the only difference between Ambedkar and Gandhi is ‘if former had created enormous knowledge with modern principles of equality, liberty, freedom and fraternity then later had superimposed purity and impurity in the society. One is a modern with human rights principles another is a human rights violator with holding the notion of purity and impurity.

Principal reason behind Dr. B. R. Ambedkar’s knowledge is his western education at the world renowned Christian Universities- Colombia University in the United States of America and London School of Economics in the Great Britain which ruled India for more than 190 years, whereas M K Gandhi went to non-meritorious institutions-running by the Indian community in South Africa and London. So if Columbia University and London School of Economics have enabled Dr B R Ambedkar to create knowledge then petty academic institutions in which M K Gandhi had studied had trained him in a way that he can bargain with the power politics so he succeeded him in political sphere unlike Ambedkar in intellectual sphere. Most of intellectuals who went to prestigious universities in the west are struggling to live in the subcontinent with their ‘western’ education training which trained them to be with ‘too much’ academic knowledge, ‘too much’ dedication for their profession, ‘too much’ ethics and ‘too much’ honest in their daily life with ‘hard working culture’. It is hard to live in a society which is carrying the spirit of ‘culture of off’ unlike the ‘culture of on’ of the white western society. Dr B R Ambedkar had come from this ‘culture of on’ of western society whereas ‘his’ followers lived in their respectable places-places of ‘culture of off’. It is just like ‘frog in well’.

UGC has allotted fund to set up few centers for the study of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, Gandhi, Social Exclusion & Inclusive Policy and Women at various state and central universities in India. Most of state and central universities started those centers for studying the life histories of Ambedkar and Gandhi.

100% of Center for ‘Ambedkar’ studies has been captured by ‘his’ non-meritorious followers who are teaching in the departments of political sciences at the every university. Of course it’s not only Ambedkar centers have captured by ‘his’ followers but also Center for the Study of Social Exclusion & Inclusive Policies at every university. Most of these Center Directors or Heads are academically unfit and nobody known their names in the academic circles.

Most of the central universities and state universities, as a matter of fact, have occupied by the non-meritorious reservation holders with few personal exemptions and candidates belonged to ‘agrarian’ or ‘business’ categories politically recruited under the open category system. I have attended many seminars, conferences and workshops organized by these non-meritorious teachers and researchers but I have seen their hands shaking while they are ‘reading’ their papers in front of ‘other’ English speaking academicians without ‘shivering’ their hands and faces. Their faces resemble inferior complexities and their hands are shivering. In fact I had presented many papers in various national and international seminars, conferences and workshops in front of eminent social scientists such as Professor Gopal Guru and Professor Satish Deshpande at the Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi. Indeed, Professor T K Oomen had chaired my presentation at the Pondicherry University way back to half decade ago. I used to be like them but my perceiveness for intellectual discourses have shadow my inferior complexities over a period of time. Credit goes to CSCS.

Non-meritorious teachers at the CAS do conduct national seminars and conferences but speakers come from the ‘same caste’ ‘same human rights orator’ ‘same Sudra bourgeois’ and ‘same vernacular’ speaking non-academicians.  The purpose of the seminar has gone the moment organizer is a vernacular speaking non-meritorious teacher. They share together some chitchat and they make fun on ‘some’ dedicated scholars who produce knowledge unlike these ‘chaired professors’ who spent entire their life to pass days, months and years till they retire in the name of ‘first generation’ or ‘lower caste’ back ground. They have many excuses to escape from the knowledge creation.

CAS or CSSE&IP or CDMS or CTS are full of ‘same caste or tribe’ and it is filled with the spirit of ‘gentleman agreement’ with the other non-meritorious ‘agrarian’ castes who join the universities by using various political recommendations.

It has become a problem when eminent Professors like Gopal Guru or Ashish Nandi or Anand Teltumbde or Arundhati Roy make comment on these non-meritorious centers, departments, institutions and universities the way in which they produce unproductive activities threatening knowledge creation. These non-meritorious use the weapon of caste to threaten intellectuals legally under the various ‘atrocities act’.

I never forget the words of leading Dalit intellectual in subcontinent Professor Gopal Guru with whom I travelled to Buddhist place from the BHU. In his own words ‘how a Ph.D. holder from the Political Science department of the JNU, have spoiled the spirit of academic scholarship by entertaining only his ‘community’ people by leaving the passion for knowledge creation. His non-meritorious alumni of JNU, mostly coming from the reservation section, who are working in the state or central universities have became mere political activists rather than scholars in every academic centers. Most of JNU or University of Hyderabad (UoH) degree holders coming from the reservation section, who are working with the subcontinent universities, are outside of the intellectual field and most of politically and manipulated researchers became ‘puppets in the hands of dominant but non-meritorious teachers’ just to get teaching jobs in the academic institutions. One can see the gentleman agreement of non-meritorious irrespective of caste, religion, gender, region etc.

Most of these CAS communities can’t even spell out eminent social scientist names such as Aloysius or Gail Omvedt or Eleanor Zelliot or Nicholas Dirk or Perry Anderson or Anand Teltumbde or Sharmila Rege who are seriously working on the literature of liberation. Very interesting observation is 70% of non-meritorious teachers and researchers in the social sciences does not even know the name of internationally renowned eminent Social Scientist Professor Gopal Guru who is working very seriously on ‘their’ liberator in the intellectual arena or does not know even the existence of Economic and Political Weekly (EPW) journal in the subcontinent. This is my personal experience with ‘reservation holders as well as agrarian non-meritorious groups’ at many state and central universities in subcontinent.

It seems like,

MERITORIOUS DR B R AMBEDKAR VERSUS NON-MERITORIOUS CENTER FOR AMBEDKAR STUDIES