IDEAS OF HISTORY

Ideas of history are always derived from the ideas of particular protagonist thoughts and actions to establish the egalitarian society with progressive behaviours by few intellectuals who changed the scenario of human society. Ideas of history would not grow in rigid societies like Asian mode of society where uncivilized religious theories and practices are ruining the thought process. Therefore, there is NO single Most Influential People of All Time from this Asia or Africa. Knowledge would flourish where there is a room for reading, writing, debate, discussion, analysis without any hypocrisy. Few are dedicating their life time for the sake of billions of lazy people who are unproductive in achieving modern goals. I started thinking why this Asian mode of society is like this with full of hypocrisy, lies, corrupt, manipulations, violence without room for knowledge. I started observing my own Pooja Yadav-Madiga community people in regard to creating modern ideas but futile. They are like every Indian Hindu in terms of manipulations. I did not understand why particular society like white western Christian society is producing enormous knowledge whereas Hindu or Islamic or Buddhist society has failed to create any knowledge except self-glorification of their uncivilized theories and practices which are contrary with global standards of human development. One cannot expect human development without achieving knowledge society. Where there is a progressive knowledge there is a peace of mind without struggling for one time food like Christian societies. Where there is a lies, corruption and violence there is always struggling for not only one time food but also for the self-respect, dignity and identity. There is NO meaning of self-respect or dignity in the context of Indian society. Indians are new to this kind of modern identities of self-respect and dignity. They are living without self-respect and dignity but they can’t live without lies or uncivilized religious practices. Hindu women are habituated to live without any self-respect or dignity from the beginning of their origin of Hinduism. Hindu women love slavery and she wanted to be slave forever. She likes most violent methods at their life partners. She loves gender, caste and religious hierarchies. She supports uncivilized theories and practices of Hindu religion. Manu is her God. Hindu women are agents of age old uncivilized ideas and practices in India. Therefore, I have taken few greatest personalities who sacrificed or dedicated their life time for establishing a just society without corruption, lies, unethical life but with love, care, affection, truth, fraternity, rights and duties. Unfortunately there is NO single Hindu in this list of progressive personalities who changed the scenario of the human society with their powerful ideas and actions. They are powerful intellectuals who questioned the existing inegalitarian thoughts and actions to re-establish the society with progressive ideas to achieve social-economic-cultural-political equality with human rights philosophy. Scientists have rejected religious sponsored myths to forward the human society with scientific temper. Sociologists have guided the human behaviors from un-civilization to civilized manner. They have questioned and changed their Christian societies but failed to change Hindu based society from its un-civilization to civilization. Many Britishers or British Christian missionaries have tried and brought out changes by their modern English education but Hindu society in India with its honor killings, infant killings, caste hierarchies, uncivilized religious theories and practices are remained as they are even in this modern day. Mahatma Jothibha Phule or Dr B R Ambedkar or Periyar Ramasamy or Gurram Jashuva or Manda Krishna Madiga are the greatest products of white western Christian education in India who tried to change the mind set of Hindus in order to change the un-civilized theories and practices. I have given few personalities that influenced the human society from their powerful thoughts and actions. It’s not a chronological order but I have written from reading the societies upon whom these below icons are influenced. I have deliberately avoided kings or queens names from the white western Christian societies even though they have reformed their kingdoms by their modern principles of equality, liberty, freedom and fraternity. I might have forgotten great personalities in this list of influential people but I will add later.

Most Influential Personalities in the Human History

 Jesus Christ

Charles Darwin

Albert Einstein

Isaac Newton

 Karl Marx

Stephen Hawkins

Plato

William Shakespeare

Aristotle

Abraham Lincoln

George Washington

Thomas Jafferson

Martin Luther

 Christopher Columbus

Charlemagne

Theodore Roosevelt

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

 Ludwig van Beethoven

Ulysses S. Grant

 Leonardo da Vinci

Augustus

Carl Linnaeus

Ronald Reagan

Charles Dickens

Paul the Apostle

Benjamin Franklin

Winston Churchill

 Thomas Edison

Franklin D. Roosevelt

Sigmund Freud

Alexander Hamilton

Woodrow Wilson

George W. Bush

 Johann Sebastian Bach

Galileo Galilei

Oliver Cromwell

James Madison

Mark Twain

Edgar Allan Poe

Joseph Smith, Jr.

Adam Smith

Immanuel Kant

James Cook

John Adams

Richard Wagner

Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky

Voltaire

Saint Peter

Andrew Jackson

 Socrates

Elvis Presley

John F. Kennedy

Augustine of Hippo

Vincent van Gogh

Nicolaus Copernicus

Vladimir Lenin

Robert E. Lee

Oscar Wilde

Cicero

Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Francis Bacon

Richard Nixon

Michelangelo

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Thomas Aquinas

Pope John Paul II

 René Descartes

Nikola Tesla

Harry S. Truman

Joan of Arc

Dante Alighieri

Grover Cleveland

John Calvin

John Locke

Noam Chomsky

10 Influential Sociologists of the 20th Century:

#1: Emile Durkheim (1858-1917)

#2: Max Weber (1862-1920)

#3: Charles Wright Mills (1916-1962)

#4: Daniel Bell (1919-2011)

#5: Erving Goffman (1922-1982)

#6: Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

#7: Jurgen Habermas (b. 1929)

#8: Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002)

#9: Anthony Giddens (b. 1938)

#10: Gary Alan Fine (b. 1950)

(Source:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1567544/Top-100-living-geniuses.html)

	Albert   Hoffman	(Swiss)	Chemist
	Tim Berners-Lee	(British)	Computer Scientist
	George Soros	(American)	Investor   Philanthropist
	Matt Groening	(American)	Satirist   Animator
	Frederick Sanger	(British)	Chemist
	Dario Fo	(Italian)	Writer   Dramatist
	Steven Hawking	(British)	Physicist
	Oscar Niemeyer	(Brazilian)	Architect
	Philip Glass	(American)	Composer
	Grigory Perelman	(Russian)	Mathematician
	Andrew Wiles	(British)	Mathematician
	Li Hongzhi	(Chinese)	Spiritual Leader
	Ali Javan	(Iranian)	Engineer
	Brian Eno	(British)	Composer
	Damian Hirst	(British)	Artist
	Daniel Tammet	(British)	Savant   Linguist
	Nicholson Baker	(American	Writer
	Daniel Barenboim	(N/A)	Musician
	Robert Crumb	(American)	Artist
	Richard Dawkins	(British)	Biologist and philosopher
	Larry Page & Sergey Brin	(American)	Publishers
	Rupert Murdoch	(American)	Publisher
	Geoffrey Hill	(British)	Poet
	Garry Kasparov	(Russian)	Chess Player
	The Dalai Lama	(Tibetan)	Spiritual Leader
	Steven Spielberg	(American)	Film maker
	Hiroshi Ishiguro	(Japanese)	Roboticist
	Robert Edwards	(British)	Pioneer of IVF treatment
	Seamus Heaney	(Irish)	Poet
	Harold Pinter	(British)	Writer   Dramatist
	Flossie Wong-Staal	(Chinese)	Bio-technologist
	Bobby Fischer	(American)	Chess Player
	Prince	(American)	Musician
	Henrik Gorecki	(Polish)	Composer
	Avram Noam Chomski	(American)	Philosopher   linguist
	Sebastian Thrun	(German)	Probabilistic roboticist
	Nima Arkani Hamed	(Canadian)	Physicist
	Margaret Turnbull	(American)	Astrobiologist
	Elaine Pagels	(American)	Historian
	Enrique Ostrea	(Philippino)	Pediatrics    neonatology
	Gary Becker	(American)	Economist
	Mohammed Ali	(American)	Boxer
	Osama Bin Laden	(Saudi)	Islamicist
	Bill Gates	(American)	Businessman
	Philip Roth	(American)	Writer
	James West	(American)	Invented the foil electrical microphone
	Tuan Vo-Dinh	(Vietnamese)	Bio-Medical Scientist
	Brian Wilson	(American)	Musician
	Stevie Wonder	(American)	Singer songwriter
	Vint Cerf	(American)	Computer scientist
	Henry Kissinger	(American)	Diplomat and politician
	Richard Branson	(British)	Publicist
	Pardis Sabeti	(Iranian)	Biological anthropologist
	Jon de Mol	(Dutch)	Television producer
	Meryl Streep	(American)	Actress
	Margaret Attwood	(Canadian)	Writer
	Placido Domingo	(Spanish)	Singer
	John Lasseter	(American)	Digital Animator
	Shunpei Yamazaki	(Japanese)	Computer scientist  physicist
	Jane Goodall	(British)	Ethologist    Anthropologist
	Romila Thapar	(Indian)	Historian
	John Goto	(British)	Photographer
	Paul McCartney	(British)	Musician
	Stephen King	(American)	Writer
	Leonard Cohen	(Canadian)	Poet & musician	8
	Aretha Franklin	(American)	Musician
	David Bowie	(British)	Musician
	Emily Oster	(American)	Economist
	Steve Wozniak	(American)	Engineer and co-founder of Apple Computers
	Martin Cooper	(American)	Inventor of the cell phone
	George Lucas	(American)	Film maker
	Niles Rogers	(American)	Musician
	Hans Zimmer	(German)	Composer
	John Williams	(American)	Composer
	Annette Baier	(New Zealander)	Philosopher
	Dorothy Rowe	(British)	Psychologist
	Ivan Marchuk	(Ukrainian)	Artist    sculptor
	Robin Escovado	(American)	Composer
	Mark Dean	(American)	Inventor    computer scientist
	Rick Rubin	(American)	Musician    producer
	Stan Lee	(American)	Publisher
	David Warren	(Australian)	Engineer
	Jon Fosse	(Norwegian)	Writer    dramatist
	Gjertrud Schnackenberg	(American)	Poet
	Graham Linehan	(Irish)	Writer    dramatist
	JK Rowling	(British)	Writer
	Ken Russell	(British)	Film maker
	Mikhail Timofeyevich Kalashnikov	(Russian)	Small arms designer
	Erich Jarvis	(American)	Neurobiologist
	Chad Varah	(British)	Founder of Samaritans
	Nicolas Hayek	(Swiss)	Businessman and founder of Swatch
	Alastair Hannay	(British)	Philosopher
	Patricia Bath	(American)	Ophthalmologist
	Thomas A. Jackson	(American)	Aerospace engineer
	Dolly Parton	(American)	Singer
	Morissey	(British)	Singer
	Michael Eavis	(British)	Organiser of Glastonbury
	Ranulph Fiennes	(British)	Adventurer
	Quentin  Tarantino	(American)	Filmmaker

AMBEDKAR STUDENTS ASSOCIATION

Ambedkar Students Association (ASA) is nothing but the Mala Students Association (MSA) at the Central University of Hyderabad. ASA is one of the most violent organization with intellectually inferior members who teaches or do research in various centers or departments at this University of Hyderabad. I have been observing this Mala community at this University since 1998. I have a very bitter experience with this intellectually inferior Mala people on this campus who never have the habit of reading books or articles or writing or analyzing skills. They join under the category of Scheduled Caste or BC-C category and come together to spoil the academic atmosphere of knowledge centers everywhere in India. Caste identities are not new phenomena to Indian society but the way in which these intellectually inferior Malas are organizing themselves have become threat to modern knowledge creation. Of course another intellectually inferior Sudra or agricultural castes such as Reddy, Kamma, Velama, Kapu, Vaishya, Raju, vernacular speaking Brahmins, Lambadis, Muslims or Christians belonged to Mala community are the same categories like Hindu or Christian Malas who are spoiling the spirit of academic discourses.

As I have been too many Universities like State or central Universities and premier centers of excellences like Sydney University-Australia, Federal University of Bahia-Brazil, CSCS-Bangalore, CSSS-Calcutta and CSDS-New Delhi in India for study or presenting seminar or conference or workshops papers I started observing the academic skills of Mala community in the region of Andhra Pradesh or Telangana in particular and India in general. I have observed these intellectually inferior Mala community university teachers and research scholars at not only state and central Universities in Andhra Pradesh or Telangana but also at Delhi, Pondicherry, North East Indian central universities in regard to their poor academic skills. They have inadequate academic skills but they are becoming Professors without publishing a single article in any reputed academic journals in India or abroad. How did SC-Mala community people are getting PhD degrees, Assistant Professorship, Associate Professorship and Professorships without sufficient academic skills like above mentioned non-Mala Sudra or Brahmin castes?

I have observed many Vice-Chancellors, Professors, Associate Professors, Assistant Professors and Research Scholars of this Mala community at this University of Hyderabad or other universities in India are having poor academic skills in knowledge creation. They are good at mobilizing their caste people in the name of Untouchability or Ambedkar to come together to stop the knowledge creation. Ambedkar’s movement has helped this most intellectually inferior people to come into higher educational institutions under the category of Reservations. Ambedkar is really destroyer of knowledge creation by incorporating reservations for this intellectually inferior Mala community in research institutions. These people are creating psychological violation among dedicated scholars in India.

Teachers and Research scholars at the University of Hyderabad knows the language of vulgarity or beating or abusing intellectuals or teasing girls or smoking or drinking alcohol. They unite together in the name of Dalit or Ambedkar to target intellectually superior western degree holders who create knowledge at this University. Professor Gummadi Nancharaiah of the Department of Economics or Coordinator of the Center for Ambedakr Studies at this University or other faculty members or research scholars of this Mala community never produced or written any authentic work in their teaching services at this University of Hyderabad except hiding their poor academic or research skills in the name of Ambedkar. Malas of this university or any university in India has started violating knowledge creation by their violent behaviors such as beating knowledge creators or by using abusive language against dedicated non-Mala teachers and students. As I knew University of Hyderabad since 1998 nobody practice Untouchability or nobody will bother about others caste. It is this Mala community teachers and students who come together to beat or assassinate the character of meritorious teachers and students to hide their poor academic skills. There is only one reason why Mala people on this campus or other campus in India segregate themselves from the mainstream campus is that because they never read or write or never show interest in knowledge creation except leading their life by selling Ambedkar name. Malas are the most inferior people who carry their inferior complexities. They use DALIT or UNTOUCHABILITY to hide their poor academic skills or their manipulations in academics. Periyar Ramasamy once said “if you come across snake or Brahmin leave the snake but kill the Brahmin, we should be aware of these intellectually inferior followers of Ambedkar manipulations in higher educational institutions. We should be careful about these intellectually inferior Mala academicians. Let us not entertain these non-meritorious Malas in the research centers.We should unite together to stop these intellectually inferior Malas from the knowledge centers.

Rohit Vemula with his alcohol or cigarettes service to Mala community on the Hyderabad University campus is a man with dangerous mind set up against the knowledge creators. He belonged to most intellectually inferior Vaddera community in Andhra Pradesh or Telangana. As I knew Rohit Vemula for couple of years he used to serve the leaders of this Mala Students Association with alcohol and cigarettes even though both are prohibited on the campus. He knew the language of primitive society such as using unparliamentarily words like his Mala friends. He is a main culprit of beating President of ABVP on the campus of University of Hyderabad along with his Mala friends. It is an open secret that these intellectually inferior Mala students beat the meritorious students and teachers who are interested in knowledge creation. Indian media is another culprit to manipulate the realties or true. When entire Mala students or research scholars or teachers at Universities in India are intellectually inferiors then where is the question of Rohit Vemula’s suicide note which is claimed to be written by an intellectual. Rohit Vemula has no history of reading or writing then where does this classical suicide note come from when he does not have reading or writing skills like his Mala teachers or students at this University of Hyderabad or other Indian universities? Why Rohit Vemula did take fake SC certificate when his parents neither belonged to Mala community? Submitting a fake certificate is a crime but nobody is talking about his fake certificate except offering sympathy or jobs. Another intellectually inferior brother Raja has been offered a good job by the Delhi Government. There are tens of people are committing suicide every day but why does Delhi government is bothering about only Rohit Vemula who is intellectually inferior Research Scholar with violent actions and thoughts. One should conduct LIE DETECTOR on this intellectually inferior Malas to know the truth about violent action taken by them to beat ABVP President on the campus.

Knowledge is very important to establish the progressive state with progressive ideas. When the Indian universities are filling with this kind of intellectually inferior reservation holders or politically recommended candidates then the entire knowledge system is getting spoiled for the last six thousand years. Can we stop these intellectually inferiors who are spoiling the spirit of academics in the name of Dalits? It’s not only threat to knowledge creation but this Mala community is bringing bad name for the entire non-Mala Dalit community by their inadequate or non-meritorious thoughts and actions in the Universities. Non-Mala Dalit castes should unite to stop these intellectually inferior Malas from their academic manipulations by using majority Dalits. God fathers such as Professor Hara Gopal or Professor Gopal Guru or Professor Kancha Ilaiah should rethink about their support to these intellectually inferiors in knowledge centers. How long you can support these intellectually inferior Malas at the cost of Merit? When can these Malas read academic texts or at least their redeemer’s writings and speeches? When can these Malas stop their manipulations or when can these Malas create knowledge? How long we should bare these intellectually inferior Malas or above mentioned castes in knowledge centers?

I am asking a straight question for these Mala community teachers at this University of Hyderabad or JNU or Delhi University or Pondicherry University, have you even been invited by the CSDS, CSSS, and CSCS to give a key note address or ending session address of any seminar or conference or workshop? Are you not ashamed of your poor academic skills after the teaching or research services of 10, 20 and 30 years at the research universities? Are you not ashamed of using reservations for your children? Are you not ashamed that you are being called as Professor whereas Romila Thapar is also a Professor of enormous knowledge production? Are you not ashamed of hiding your poor academic skills in the name of first generation of Dalit or rural back ground or poor economically? What is your academic contribution while you are a student/research scholar/teacher/professor of university in India?

We should demand for adding Right to Merit in the fundamental rights of Constitution of India.

HISTORY, NATIONALISM AND MULTICULTURAL IDENTITIES

As a student of progressive historical ideas and thoughts which ingrained in my blood from the birth I born to inter-caste, inter-religious and inter-regional parents who belonged to Pooja-Yadav-Madiga communities in south Asian society. I have been haunted by various queries, questions and suspect regarding super imposition of single identities upon various multiple identities by using the state apparatus.  State apparatus is highly misinterpreted, misguided and misused by uneducated people who hold offices of President to a local police in India. Therefore, I started reading some serious books written by few serious social scientists such as Romila Thapar, Gopal Guru or Nivedita Menon after the event of JNU sedition case in which few progressive students had been jailed under this notorious act by the Hindutva based non-progressive, anti-freedom of speech of central government of India.

Of course reading is my life and my small thatched home is full of books with approximately 1000 books. I started buying books since the days I spent at the Center for the Study of Culture and Society (CSCS) which seeded a strong desire of reading serious books on culture and society. I should thank CSCS for its unforgettable contribution in my life in intellectual arena. I met many mainstream eminent scholars at this institution. I might have read the literature on Nationalism in this institution but I read a very serious work on this topic is G Aloysius Nationalism Without A Nation in India. It is a serious work which broken the ground from the theoretical aspects by giving existing inegalitarian theories and practices of Indian Hindu society. The work is dealing with the history, tradition, protest and human rights from the perspective of sub-subaltern experiences. Perhaps, I have my own problems with the academic mafia of Ambedkar’s school of thought. Professor Aloysius, of course, is not from this school of thought by birth but having sympathy with non-meritorious followers of Ambedkar has been a big problem in the academic contributions to knowledge. As a matter of fact, reservation holders to which Dalit-Mala communities belong are unfit for teaching or research at higher educational institutions by drawing attention from their inadequate, non-reading, non-meritorious skills and non-academic activities by members of this Untouchable-Mala community at any university in India. In fact they are the destroyers of the knowledge creation in higher educational institutions. Another non-meritorious academic community is Sudra categories to which agricultural categories i.e Reddy, Kamma, Velama and Kapu belonged. One can’t talk about vernacular speaking Brahmins or Tribals or Vaishyas (trading community) or Kshatriyas(rulers) or Muslims or Sikhs or Buddhists or Jainas or Dalit-Mala or tribal converted Christians in this space of knowledge creation based on their poor academic skills. They are mostly inferiorized by their poor academic skills in research or teaching field. However, mainstream academicians with western degrees have sympathy on these intellectually inferior categories. As historian Harban Mukhia rightly observed about how kings of any Hindu dynasties in India had been illiterates, therefore, depending on the court priests or traditional judiciary under the category of uneducated Brahmins for any decision which ruined the spirit of social justice. These illiterate kings of various dynasties have enjoyed the life of unethical or juxtaposed to welfare state. Of course welfare state is nowhere in the thoughts of any Hindu or Muslim ruler in any period of ancient or medieval histories of India. It is very much invention of British Raj.

However, is there any linking thread between history, nationalism and multicultural identities in India? What is the meaning of nationalism in the context of JNU event which redefined the meaning of nationalism which is different from the definition of Hindutva nationalism in India? How do political thinkers like Gopal Guru or Nivedia Menon and historians like Romila Thapar or Harban Mukhia defined real meaning of Constitutional nationalism which differs from the definition of nationalism of right wing Hindu fundamental groups? Is there any bad nationalism or good nationalism or good Indian/Hindu or bad Indian/Hindu like good Muslim and bad Muslim?

How to address the words like nation, nation state or nationalism or governmentality state in the context of Indian society when right wing Hindutva forces are super imposing its single identity of Hindutva on multicultural identities? Is there any fundamental differences between Constitutional nationalism or Hindutva nationalism or both are carrying the spirit of Indian Hindu nationalism?

Indian Constitutional nationalism is promising its people in order to claim their identities, rights and welfare of any community whereas Hindu nationalism is enforcing its single identity of Hindu upon the non-Hindu castes. Majority Hindus with Indian academic degrees are standing by Hindutva ideologies since the analytical skills of these ideologies are poor or since they do not have any culture of reading a book or article. The fate of the Indian academy is with full of non-meritorious teachers and researchers who made research institutions as elementary schools with their non-reading habit culture with unproductive academic activities.

When internationally renowned Romila Thapar had planned for JNU in its initial stage of foundation to make it with superior academic standards, freedom of speech with critical bent of mind with the like minded historians Harban Mhkhia then the entire foundations of Indian universities has made universities as merely elementary schools by recruiting non-academic people with Indian academic degrees. There is NO place for western degree holders in Indian academic institutions by fearing that intellectuals are threat to their non-academic activities. University Grants Commission (UGC) or ICSSR or other Science or Engineering funding institutions have spoiled the spirit of knowledge creation by its non-meritorious rules and regulations. Clearing NET is one among non-meritorious rule of UGC. Western degree holders of few intellectuals with Indian academic degrees are going away from these UGC recognized non-meritorious academic institutions for unable to bare casteist politics of reservation holders particularly by the followers of Ambedkar.

Universities supposed to be centers of progressive ideas and thoughts but unfortunately Indian universities have spoiled the spirit of knowledge creation by practicing plagiarism in its academic discourses. Indian universities are plagiarizing western knowledge in its every discipline. Therefore how to expect a progressive scholar or writer from the Indian universities from the degree holders of Indian academics? Societies needs progressive knowledge creators like Romila Thapar but unfortunately Indian society is nowhere in the eye sight of reading books. Reading progressive books will create creative ideas and thoughts in order to reform individually but unfortunately these pseudo are ruining the state from its unproductive religious prison chains to modern or welfare state in order to establish modern principles of equality, liberty, freedom and fraternity. When could Indians give importance to progressive or creative ideas? When could Indians start reading like its CSDS, CSSS or CSCS institutions? When could so-called Professors of Indian universities learning proper English or when can we expect Indian Professors to reading text books? When can we expect Indian Professors able to write a single line in their own in the English without plagiarizing western articles or books? When can Professors from state or central universities in India start learning good English? When can State Universities think of recruiting intellectuals? When can Indian Professors with few exemptions from CSDS, CSSS, JNU or CSCS ( with few individual exemptions from HCU) start reading EPW or Seminar or Social Scientist journals or when can entire Dalit-Mala community stop its caste politics in the name of Ambedkar? When can Professors or Associate Professors or Assistant Professors dedicate themselves for the reading habit? When can we expect Indian academy will start reading mainstream journals and books written by serious scholars like Romila Thapar? When can so-called Professors ashamed of their inadequate academic skills? When can Dalit-Mala’s ashamed of their poor academic skills? When can people stop thinking about reservations in any form?

Let us read to create creative ideas in order to establish a modern state in India.

UNCIVILIZED COW NATIONALISM VERSUS CIVILIZED GOAT NATIONALISM

Theory of Justice is a classical piece written by John Rawls in the twentieth century which paved way for opening a room for discussion on socio-political-economic or cultural rights of various categories under this broad category of Justice. Justice can be in any form but an individual should not fail to get justice for any reason or for any identity. A civilized human being would never refuse to any protest ideologies in order to expose their crushed identities in the public sphere except for extreme radical Islamic or Hindutva ideologies which are a dangerous thought process for the human existence with the fear of Islama or Hindutva phobia.

I may raise a doubt about whether some societies or religious faiths do know the practice of civilized behavior in public sphere at all? I am asking this question myself whether I really know the meaning of civilization being part and parcel of this Indian subcontinent. What is my personal experience with Indians or Hindus for the past 39 years in this subcontinent? Does Hindus know the meaning of art of living without lies or unethical life? Can Indians live without psychological or physical violence or social hierarchies that have been sponsored by Hindu religious scriptures which ruined their thought process? When can we expect an Indian speaking truth at least in few minutes? Can Indian speak truth at all in his or her life time? Can Indian pass a single minute without lying?

Since I do not have any personal experience with Muslims I can’t say about their daily life but I can say about Hindus hundred percentage due to my birth in particular communities such as a hegemonic Pooja-Yadav community and marginalized Madiga community to which my parents belongs. Pooja Yadavas are one of the ruling kingdoms of this Indian subcontinent. Yadavas had ruled Indians for more than six thousand years. We have still got Mysore Kingdom of Yadav-Vadayaars. We are still ruling entire north Indian states as well as few south Indian metropolitan cities such as Secunderabad. So I had born in this powerful Pooja- Yadav community in India. And Yadavas are the ruling communities of other countries within Asia or Pacific region such as Nepal or Fiji or Bali or wherever Hindus live Yadavas rule them. The recent elections in Bihar has clearly witnessed in the state of Bihar that Yadav’s party under the leadership of Lalu Prasad Yadav had defeated Hindu’s party Bharatiya Janata Party in the elections. It is not only Bihar but also 16 states in north or west or eastern states are controlling by Yadav community. We are the rulers of Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh states. We are the predominant community of entire north India without doubt. This is my social back ground to which my half identity goes whereas my another identity is the identity of Jambava who ruled this country according to Hindu puranas so I belonged to two powerful communities but Yadav’s are the most powerful and hegemonic community which ruled Indians for more than six thousand years without any challenge from the non-Yadav communities in the Indian subcontinent. Hence, I knew the every moment of Hindu communities rather than Christians or Muslims or Sikhs. Perhaps I can guess that there won’t be greater differences between Hindus and non-Hindus in terms of unethical behaviors or violent practices in this subcontinent. Eminent Social Scientists with human face Gurram Jashuva Madiga-Yadav and Professor Kancha Ilaiah Yadav who (both had) converted to Christianity argued that one can derive realities by using personal experiences in a society like India where truth has been buried from the six thousands year in the name of Hindu culture and tradition. Unfortunately there is not even a single resistance voice from the victims of Hindu fundamentalism in this subcontinent. My Yadav Mother SUGUNA YADAV says one should bring out buried histories of resistance cultures or ideologies into public sphere in order to create an egalitarian society where nobody can fear of eating beef or dog or any animal or bird without superimposition like white western Christian societies where everyone exercise their freedom of choice or individuality without interference of religion or state or culture or tradition.

But my Brazil and Australian education has changed my mind set from supporting lies to supporting truth. I find that white western Christians in Brazil or Australia are very honest and hard working with strong ethical back ground whereas Asians are most lie based people with uncivilized thoughts and actions. When I stay in Sydney I saw cricket match between India and Australia but white western Australians never behave like India’s behave with uncivilized behavior or vulgar language. Australians were behaved very decently with descent behavior. But if anyone observes Indian behavior during the cricket between Indians and non-Indians we can say Indians are most uneducated people in the world. We feel to teach Indians how to behave decently in public sphere or during the cricket match. I never saw such ugly behavior like Indians in Brazil or Australia at the time of cricket. Brazilians are named for foot ball but they never behave such an uncivilized manner that Indians behave during the time of cricket match.

Now I want to raise a question about what is the role of Indian academic institutions from the Elementary School to University in order to make Indians in such an ugly condition that Indians behave with ugly behavior without any decency. Why Indian Hindu education system did have failed to train Indians with civilized thoughts or actions in public sphere? Why did Indian’s behave in a way that nobody can appreciate except Hindus in India? Why Indian academic system does has failed to train Indians in relation to honest or hard work without barbarian thoughts and actions. Cricket nationalism in India is a fake nationalism to unite all the pseudo under the umbrella of Hindu identity. When would Indians learn to behave like civilized white western Christians at home or public sphere? When would Indians can learn to see sports is sports without bringing BHARAT MATA KI JAI or another fake nationalisms in the name of VANDEMATARAM? When would Indian’s learn sports spirit or knowledge spirit?  Hindus say that they had universities like Takshashila or Nalanda universities 2000 years ago but why did they failed to discover any subject or item or any without depending on white western Christian societies for developing Indian society?  Indians claim of 0 (zero) is not discovered by Indians at all if we observe the mental condition of Indians. They do not process or acquire intellectual ship or they do not have any critical thinking process to find or discover any theory. As per my experience of Indians I can assume that no Indian can meet the international standard in regard to thought process or behavior to be good human beings. Indians does not have history of good human beings if we read their uncivilized cultural and traditional behaviours. Indians are the most hypocrites people in the world. I never seen such kind of hypocrites in my life time.

When would Indian Hindus realize their inferior knowledge system or inferior human mind in order to compete with white western Christian mind? When would Indian’s behave with civilized thoughts in public sphere? When would they learn to be civilized in the world? When would Indian’s learn the meaning of honesty or knowledge or humanity or progressive ideas without assassinating the character of white western Christians through the non-meritorious Indian cinema in the name of Indian culture and tradition? When would India’s learn the spirit of sports without jealousy or inferior complexities or when would Indian’s support modernity or human rights of individuals without imposing their so-called culture or tradition on progressive minds.

Therefore, I can clearly define Indian ideology from my personal experience with Indian castes that Indian means anti-scientific, anti-progressive thoughts, anti-rationality, anti-humanity, anti-love, anti-care, anti-hospitality, anti-merit, anti-equality-liberty-freedom-fraternity, anti-patience, anti-tolerance, anti-application of reason, anti-human but cow…so cow nationalism is very dangerous to the progressive ideas to establish modern state in India.

Let us fight against religious intolerance in the name of Hindu culture and tradition…where there is creative ideas flourish these lie based religious fundamentalism will be disappeared so let us create modern knowledge to bury the religious fundamentalism in the name of cow.

AMBEDKAR, GANDHI AND NEHRU

Dr B R Ambedkar is an eminent Social Scientist i.e. Economist, Political thinker, Sociologist and Advocate with a strong western knowledge back ground. His western studies at the Christian Universities Colombia University in the United States of America and London School of Economics at the Great Britain have enabled him to architect the Constitution of India with the support of other drafting committee members. His Buddhist or any other indigenous knowledge had never helped him to get any modern knowledge i.e. knowledge of human rights. By the time Ambedkar went to Colombia University or LSE they are filled with many eminent Social Scientists who changed the thought process of him. In fact, there is a huge difference between Ambedkar, Gandhi and Nehru who went to study abroad. If Ambedkar went to study the world prestigious knowledge centers i.e. Colombia University and London School of Economics then Gandhi and Nehru went to study at the non-knowledge centers in South Africa or London. Indeed Gandhi or Nehru never focuses on intellectual field because they went to study with their own personal money to enjoy life in abroad unlike Dr B R Ambedkar who went with merit scholarship which led his life to focus on creating progressive knowledge. His volumes are witness for the academic scholarship he created in the aspects of history, polity, society, culture, Scriptures, religion, constitution etc unlike Gandhi’s or Nehru’s non-serious works which became icons for non-serious academic community of India. Nehru’s The Discovery of India or Gandhi’s My Experience with Truth are nowhere standing in the intellectual arena unlike Ambedkar’s classical pieces running into tens of thousands of pages. Indeed Gandhi and Nehru are intellectually inferiors than Dr B R Ambedkar who is not only a dedicated Social Scientist but also a champion of human rights of people in India. His human rights approach is not only benefited lower sections of the Hindu society but for entire people of the society. If Gandhi’s or Nehru’s National Movement had benefited only to the Brahmins politically, economically, culturally, religiously, educationally then the efforts of Ambedkar had benefited entire Indians. But unfortunately he had forgotten to guide his people in intellectual arena. His guidance of getting political power has ruined the spirit of knowledge creation by his own Mahar/Mala communities. They are focusing on earning money through various back doors like their fellow Hindus. Therefore, there is no difference between Gandhi or Nehru or Ambedkar to lead their followers to earn money through various unethical ways. If anybody observes Hindus or Mahars/Malas in terms of corruption lies, unethical activities or uncivilized thoughts or practices then you can’t find difference between them. Both groups are competing for power, power in many ways. If Hindus use their hereditary hierarchies to ruin the spirit of knowledge creation then Untouchable communities are using caste as a weapon to capture power. Both are using caste card to capture power. Power is depending on the minority or majority to dominate each other. Gandhi and Nehru thought Hindus to capture power at the cost of egalitarian principals of Theory of Justice (John Rawls) without creating any progressive knowledge. The same way Dr B R Ambedkar had guided his community but with converting to non- Hindu believes. He guided his community people politically but he had failed to guide them intellectually. Therefore, his community people have become intellectually inferiors in the knowledge creation by competing with their fellow Hindus.

If the most persecuted Jewish community of Germany had focused on knowledge creation through which they have attracted entire world to change their social status then the world most persecuted Untouchable or African community of India-Asia/Africa had become manipulators by ignoring the value of knowledge creation. With my personal experience I understood that people who captured knowledge are becoming world leaders in every aspect like the white western Christian society than the people who are interested in lies, unethical practices, dishonest, corruption like Asians and Africans are becoming agents of age old practices of uncivilized thoughts and actions.

With the personal experience I got in Brazil and Australia when I went to study International Graduate Course in History, Heritage, Memory at the Federal University of Bahia, Brazil or Master of Human Rights at the University of Sydney in Australia with the merit scholarships everyone from those countries used to say that ‘oh you are a smart student’ unlike your fellow Indians. Here smart student means intellect academically. But very few smart students are the people who read, write, understand and analyze any society or culture or tradition to say people that what is right and wrong or what is good and bad even though people don’t like their words or actions. Their actions or thoughts are progressive and creative unlike people who are going to abroad for earning millions of dolors in the name of education

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi or Nehru is such kind of people who went to South Africa or London for their studies with their own block money unlike Dr B R Ambedkar. In fact Gandhi was a Son of Chief Minister of his region whereas Nehru was a Son of richest person unlike Ambedkar whose father was an employee of the British Raj. Gandhi’s and Nehru’s richness had paved way for getting political power by using unethical movements unlike the Human Rights of Dr B R Ambedkar. Ambedkar was, in fact, a strong supporter of self-respect, dignity, perhaps no idea about his standpoint on individual identity. He spoke for group identity i.e. identity of Untouchables in India like Gandhi’s battle for Touchable Indians to transform power from egalitarian British to Indian hegemonic communities. Of course British Raj is the main enemy of sub-subaltern sections who established the hegemony of Top of the twice borne communities in the Indian society at the cost of marginalized sections unlike white western Christian missionaries who came to abolish Indian way of uncivilized practices such as practice of Untouchability or infant deaths. There is a conflict of differences of British rulers in India and British missionaries. If British rulers install the hegemony of dominant castes in India then the British missionaries had started educating Brahmin women and lower caste people. So human rights students should pose a question of what is the value of individuality in the context of Asia in general or India in particular when the religious fundamental identities (non-Christian faiths in Asia or Africa) are crushing the individual rights of people.

Let us fight for individual rights or freedom to advance the egalitarian principals of equality, liberty, freedom and fraternity.

HELL: THY NAME IS INDIAN UNIVERSITIES

I have been witnessing a vulgar behavior of Ph.D. student of Kannada Literature in the Dravidian University since more than one year. He is from the state of Karnataka. He belonged to some intellectually inferior non-meritorious backward-low caste community which is falling under the category of Open Backward Class (OBC) Reservation. He is almost 30 years old non-meritorious PhD student with a tongue of lies, manipulations and vulgar behavior with violent nature in the name of BHARAT MATA KI JAI. This non-meritorious student is doing his PhD under the guidance of another intellectually inferior reservation holder. As his guide does not know what is research this boy has developed the hatredness against modern principals of self-respect, dignity, individuality, body and self by crushing the human values of love, care, affection, humanity etc. I have seen violent behavior of this violent PhD student while beating small animals with big stones. I have seen this OBC student with alcohol and abusive tongue in the company of his Kannada Brahmin PhD student friend.

As I had been to Brazil and Australia for my studies in Human Rights courses it has been a very peculiar to see such kind of behavior in him in particular and common in most of Indians. His behavior is not first or lost but it’s my personal experience of such kind of ugly behavior of Kannada student.  Whenever there is a cricket match is going on between India and non-India then this man comes and uses his tongue very vulgarly against the non-Indian women. Indeed he uses same vulgar language against our own Indian mother or sister. But for these anti-human rights Hindu fundamental using vulgar language against non-Indians is a national. If whoever human rights people like me oppose such kind of vulgar behavior then these non-meritorious PhD students or teachers come into his risk in the name of INDIAN. This 30 years non-meritorious reservation holder or his intellectually inferior friends knows only drinking alcohol or drugs or teasing girls or passing comments on girls or women or using un-parliamentary language against white western societies. Very interesting thing is he is not even fit for academics but how come he passes his Masters or how come he is doing PhD without knowing the meaning of RESEARCH. I have observed most of these reservation holders backed by agricultural castes, trading castes, vernacular speaking Brahmins are most non-meritorious students like their intellectually inferior teachers or guides.

These intellectually inferior students belonged to various Indian castes are most-unproductive, most violent, uncivilized and most lazy people on the university campuses like their teachers who spend their time for chit chat or personal matters from morning 10 am to evening 5pm. They define Indian identity from their Hindu religious point of view by crushing the identities of many i.e gender, caste, region, linguistic, religion etc. If any foreign degree holder tries to explain what is right and wrong and good and bad in academics or responsibilities of students or teachers then they use their tongue for ugly things like I will fuck your mother or sister…in the name of BHARAT MATA KI JAI… They are most dangerous to their own women because these intellectually inferior alcoholic PhD students rape their own women and give slogans against non-Indian women. Their education is not teaching morals indeed ugly behavior with the women or intellectuals. I do know the vulgar behavior of Indian mindset to prevent advancement of society from the ugly thoughts of their everyday life mostly pre-determined by their religious mind set.

Generally universities suppose to create progressive students, scholars and intellectuals but unfortunately these Indian universities are producing thieves and liars unlike its western scholars who hold truth and hard work by creating progressive knowledge throughout their life.

There is no much difference between Vemula Rohit-an OBC PhD student from the University of Hyderabad and this ugly PhD student from the Dravidian University in terms of practicing violent or lie based life without knowing the value of good human being or without knowing the value of freedom of expression or freedom of speech. Universities are running with the money of common man but unfortunately these intellectually inferior students and teachers are ruining academic spirit by indulging into various unethical aspects of life

Finally Indian universities are hell for progressive intellectuals and humanists 

MODERNITY UNDER THREAT

We are in an authoritarian state where there is no freedom of speech or freedom of expression. I am really shocked by the way in which eminent Professor Nivedita Menon is being booked by the State in the name of Sedition. How to understand this fascist Hindutva state when uneducated politicians are ruling unlawfully with the full pledged support of uneducated masses, bureaucrats, judiciary and hegemonic ideas by crushing the progressive voices in the present scenario of twenty first century India? Why is the majority academic community of India (majority of Indian academic community is non-meritorious in the intellectual domain with few exceptional cases of individuals or centers such as CSDS, CSSS, CSCS and with few JNU) is so silent and what made these intellectually inferior academic community is silent when the intellectually superior scholars are being targeted by fascist Hindu government at the center in the name of sedition? How to understand intellectually inferior subaltern (teachers belonged to agrarian castes, trading castes, tribal communities and Kshatriya castes and Indian languages speaking Brahmins) castes and sub-subaltern castes (so-called Ambedkar followers in the academic institutions) who are intellectually inferior are silence over the State repression against mainstream intellectuals and their progressive voices? What does Center for Women Studies do when progressive intellectuals like Professor Nivedita Menon or Human Rights Activist Teesta Setalvaad are being harassed by the hegemonic ruling groups for their unconditional support to Rights? Did Nivedia or Teesta have done any greater crime by writing classical pieces or fighting for the rights on the issues or Rights, Modernity, State Repression against intellectuals or marginalized sections? Why did intellectually inferior university teachers are lack of proper analytical skills or at least meaning of Sedition when the entire Knowledge Centers are opposing state repression against intellectuals? What is the voice of so-called university teachers or research scholars who are spending their life time for chit chat about movies, heroines, porn stars, cricket or political parties when the fascist Hindutva state is targeting intellectuals who are questioning the authoritarian nature of fascist Hindutva ruler’s? Does Nehruvian or Gandhenian ideologies who incorporated religion into politics are main reason behind all these atrocities on progressive thinkers and intellectuals? Can’t Indian masses or Indians themselves live without interference of religion or caste in their day to day life? When does academic community of Indian universities learn to know the importance of progressive ideas and thoughts for bringing an egalitarian society where human beings can live without referring to their social identity? When does progressive thoughts and ideas can be produced by Indian universities like white western Christian societies or Roman or Greek philosophers who have changed the scenario of their societies thousands of years ago? When would Indian academy react to the authoritarian nature of state in suppressing progressive minds? When would these intellectually inferior groups realize the importance of progressive ideas and thoughts? When would Ambedkar followers learn to learn to come with progressive scholars without isolating themselves from the society? When would intellectually inferior tribal communities or non-Brahmin or vernacular speaking Brahmins or Indian degree (holders) communities to come up with the side of progressive knowledge creators? When would Indian women learnt to read books and learnt to write progressive articles or essays or books to save themselves from the clutches of slavery? Now it is the responsibility of people who spoiled the spirit of knowledge creation in India to save progressive minds from the threats of aggressive Hindutva forces.