What
are the nation, nation state and nationalism in the context of Indian Hindu
society? Is there any rational or civilized nationalism at all or is it all any
nationalism existed in India is a doubtful. For my understanding of reading on
real nationalism is very much laid in the philosophy of broader understanding
of equality, liberty, freedom and fraternity to establish egalitarian state in
which every minority or weaker section can enjoy his or her status without
afraid of any threatening from the majority groups. But unfortunately Indian
Hindu society is giving derogatory meaning to the word called nationalism since
its origin of so-called national movement. Does Indian society have the ethical
stamina to define the nationalism from the philosophy of western principals of
minority or weaker section rights to exercise food habits, beliefs, dresses etc
without threatening calls from the majority Hindu groups? Why majority Hindu
groups are in a great position of lack of ethical stamina to accept the freedom
of speech or freedom of writing from the minority groups such as Untouchables
and Muslims? What made Hindu regime to support the violence against weaker
sections Untouchables and Muslims even though UNO has declared proclamation of human
rights for every human being irrespective of majority or minority and rich or
poor and white or Asian. How to define nation state in the present
circumstances when the Hindu regime is supporting ‘chicken’ ‘mutton’ ‘vegetarian’
eaters to kill ‘beef’ eaters. It seems that even judiciary is supporting violence
against beef eaters. According to scientific studies beef is the highly nutritious
food in the world. It is giving relief to many lifeless people who are
suffering from grater deceases. Why can’t apex court in India proclaim judgment
on beef eating without leaving it to personal beliefs? Generally law offices in
the white western Christian nations come into existence in support of
scientific reason and its application without looking into its citizens
beliefs. How to understand when a lower court in Utter Pradesh issued an order
to file an FIR against a victim family for the cause of beef eating based on
the forensic reports. What is wrong with beef eating and is it against
fundamental rights of India? Or beef eating is a crime? Should judiciary system
determine the food habits of weaker sections what to eat or what not to eat?
Are we living in the dark age of Ram
Rajya or Sri Krishanas Pandava era
in this twenty first century? Are we living in the fear of life threat from the
majority Hindu groups who are controlling our food habits or dress habits? Who
are responsible for leaving weaker sections in the hands of majority groups to
die? Who gave permission to majority Hindutva groups to come and hang weaker
sections for the sake of beef eating? Where is sate when the majority groups
are killing, raping, maiming the weaker sections in the name of caste, religion,
culture, tradition, food habits and dress code? Where are so-called progressive
intellectuals when atrocities are going against Muslims and Untouchables? What made Professor Ashish Nandi to say that
traditional Hindu based RSS has the cultural intellectual arguments? What is the line of knowledge creation among Hindu
terrorist group RSS or its outfits such as BJP, VHP, Bajrang Dal except ingraining
uncivilized religious beliefs to
suppress the Untouchables or women in the name of purity and impurity. What is
wrong if any mighty Yadav come forward to issue moral orders to ban eating
sheep or goat of non-Yadavas for the sake of his love towards sheep or goat
with which that Yadav is very much associated right from his or her childhood
days unlike a Hindu Brahmin who never associate with any productive things
except depending on unproductive activities such as temples or spreading
superstitions and blind beliefs in the name of karma to carry his legacy of superiority of Brahmin self. What will
happen entire mighty Yadav community ban the sheep eating of non-Yadavas? What
if farmers issue an order to ban eating his or her rice for the sake of his or
her love towards his crops? What if a chicken rendering people issue a threat
to ban the chicken eating among rice eaters or mutton eaters or beef or pork
eaters? What will happen if Chamars ban the shoe wearing of non-Chamars for the
sake of their love towards skin of the cow or buffalo? What will happen if the
white western Christians ban the entry of Hindus into their countries for the
sake of conflict religious beliefs and superstitions or blind beliefs of Hindus
that their countries should not get spoiled like irrational Hindu society? What
will happen if Western educational institutions ban the students from the
non-knowledge societies such as Asia or subcontinent for getting knowledge? Why
Indian Hindu government is has lack of intellectuals to define what fundamental
right is or what is not? Why can’t majority Hindus failed to understand meaning
of Constitutionalism and its philosophy of equality, liberty, freedom and
fraternity. What made Hindus to be inferiors in terms of knowledge creation which
can be benefited by the universal human being despite of their 6000 years of
domination in subcontinent? What made majority Hindus scare of Untouchables or Muslims.
Why is Hindu society have failed to produce intellectuals but liars, manipulators,
fraud, dishonest, ethically week, morally down, sadhus, sanyasis, etc . I am
reminding what a great genius Professor Aloysius said about this uncivilized
people in his ground breaking work NATIONALISM WITHOUT A NATION IN INDIA.
Majority identities should create a space for intellectual discussions, debate,
thought sharing, opinion sharing through vast reading of social sciences with
rational approach. Religious tolerance is what Father of Indian Constitution Dr
B R Ambedkar said in his classical piece Indian Constitution. When will Hindus
follow this great genius who rebelled against uncivilized Hindu religion and
its irrational practices? You can kill
progressive minds like us but you can’t kill spirit of progressivism. If billions
of irrational Hindus rise to kill progressive minds ineed spirit will not die.
I may get killed by Hindutva groups but my spirit will not die. When India
would became nation state from the definition of western nationalism. When will
Hindus learn to respect minorities and Untouchables for their food habits? Or Should
Ambedakr born again from his tomb to teach Hindus what is rationality what is
not like Jesus Christ who sacrificed Himself on Cross for the sake of our sins?
You can’t focus on national interest without cleaning your kitchen which is
filled with human shit. What Untouchables and Muslims want is exercising their
freedom of food habits so weaker sections need to live without fear but not
national interest. When there is no guarantee of life in your own kitchen then
where will you focus on national interests? You may manipulate white western Christian
society by sending cheap labout to those countries to serve white people but
truth is thicker than blood so soon weaker sections will capture political
power through the constitutional means as their Master Ambedakr said, political
power is the master key to abolish at lease few hierarchies or inequalities if
not religiously well established caste system. What Nicolas Dirks said in his
master piece Castes of mind? As long as Indian Hindu society carry castes of
mind they won’t became intellectuals or they won’t allow their neighbors with
their uncivilized and irrational thoughts and actions. Hindu Brahmins have
spoiled the USA, Great Britain, and Australia, Canada or other European
countries with their migration to those countries 100 years back by introducing
Yoga or mediation. ISCON is another Hindu organization who is converting whites
to this uncivilized religion. If you look the knowledge creation of above
countries where Hindus are majority knowledge is decreasing year by year.
Africa or Middle East countries will be dominating in coming decades in terms
of knowledge creation
No comments:
Post a Comment