Sunday 17 July 2022

The Plunders and the Victims of Global Human Rights and Democratization and My Lived Experience with 2011-Master of Human Rights and Democratization (MHRD Asia-Pacific) 2011 classmates and teachers at Sydney University, Australia- Dr.Suryaraju Mattimalla Why I Am Not Indian: The Untouchable Rejecting India's Citizenship



 

The Plunders and the Victims of Global Human Rights and Democratization and My Lived Experience with 2011-Master of Human Rights and Democratization (MHRD Asia-Pacific) 2011 classmates and teachers at Sydney University, Australia- Dr.Suryaraju Mattimalla Why I Am Not Indian: The Untouchable Rejecting India's Citizenship

 

A national Hindu terrorist called "Global Human Rights Face" at the Global Campus of Human Rights: A Study of Master of Human Rights and Democratization (MHRD Asia-Pacific) 2011 classmates- Dr.Suryaraju Mattimalla Why I Am Not Indian: The Untouchable Rejecting India's Citizenship

 

Let me state unequivocally that I did not use the term "terrorism" to define terrorist ideologies in the way that the white western/Aryan eastern media, scholars, theorists, and activists do. It is purely a definition and also a biased definition of terrorism for which Muslims become victims. It is a white western conspiracy to victimize a Muslim in the name of the definition of terrorism. In my definition, a terrorist won’t come with a Dupatta, beard, gun, Quran, Allah, sharia, or burqa,  Abaya, Jilbab, but very much with mind games with purity and impurity ideologies, casteist identities, Aryan identities, dress, soft body language, cute look, wearing a modern dress, speaking English, practicing bribes, i.e., Guru Dakshina[i], or pretending to be a human rights face in a one and a half hour human rights classroom and becoming his or her original pure soul after the class on human rights and democratization with his or her Hindutva books. A terrorist comes with yoga, meditation, spirituality, Pundit, Thakur, Gupta, Reddy, Choudhury, Naidu, Rao, Sharma, Sanskrit,  Vegetarian, namaskaram, Samskaram, family, marriage, dowry, culture, tradition, Guru-Shishya concept, Khan, Sayyad, Singh, Mahavir, Siddartha, the art of living, Kamandal, vibhuthi, ISCON, etc.

A Muslim is a visible terrorist by terrorizing non-Muslims by his or her appearance, whereas a Hindu terrorist is a soft and invisible terrorist, more dangerous than any terrorist in the world. A Hindu terrorist is coming with western education and a soft or theoretical English background in India. Almost all Hindu terrorists with the background of RSS, VHP, BJP, Congress, Left, Liberal, Marxist, Human Rights, Sri Ram Sena, Shiva Sena, etc have had a strong western education background for the last 400 years. They have been getting western education since colonial India. Through their theoretical books, they are terrorizing untouchable castes, Yazidis, and sexual minorities through their theories. They are always on their friendly BBC, CNN, etc., unlike Arab or Urdu-educated terrorists. Western education is paving the way for reproducing age-old inhuman evil systems against untouchable castes in India and Nepal[ii].

A Muslim never has a double face. Their dress, food habits, greetings, and way of life are the same across time and space, whereas a Hindu terrorist has many avatars. It is very difficult to call him a terrorist since he or she changes their colors according to the situation and opportunity. I am going to deal with these kinds of Hindu terrorists who are pretending to be global human rights faces on the global stage by remaining terrorists at the India or Nepal level with their core membership in Hindu terrorist organizations, way of life, casteist, racist, socio-religious-cultural terrorist groups. They are omnipresent and omnipotent across time and space. Every Hindu belongs to this terrorist ideology of chameleons and parasitic avatars. They are loved by the entire world for their softness, purity, impurities, cultures, traditions, and ways of life.

Only India's untouchable castes burst their black-skinned and white-masked faces, as Negros burst their white black-skinned and white-masked faces, or Janus faces. So, in my definition of terrorism, only untouchable castes are aware of a Brahmin's or his Hindu agent's constant terrorism in the Hindu world, just as a Negro is aware of a white person's constant terrorism in the white world. So MHRD[iii] belongs to my definition of caste, untouchability, race, purity, and impurity-based terrorism. The white world practices terrorism in the name of race, and the Hindu world practices terrorism in the name of caste. The untouchable is a victim in the Hindu world, just as the Negro is a victim in the white world. In that case, whites and Hindus are brothers and sisters in arms, just as Yazidis are victims in the Muslim world, adding another Muslim to the long-running terrorism. The Hindu terrorism has a long history of 6000 years of genocide against untouchable castes. Muslim terrorism has a history of 1,000 years of genocide against Yazidis, and white terrorism has 500 years of genocide against Negroes.

So the caste-based genocide against untouchable castes is the longest genocide in human history without an end. It is an unending genocide against untouchable castes in India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Japan, etc., wherever Hindu, Buddhist, Jain, Sikh, and Parsi worlds exist across time and space. Political genocides have very short histories of one to five years, just like Rwanda, the Holocaust, Tigray, or the 30-year Armenian Christian genocide by Turkish Muslims. Of course, I'm not referring to sexual minorities because white, Hindu, Muslim, Buddhist, Sikh, Parsi, Jain, and Jew sexual minorities are protected, as opposed to LGBTQ communities from slaves or blacks, untouchable caste, or Yazidi backgrounds. When I talk about slaves or blacks, untouchable caste, and Yazidis, I am also talking about sexual minorities from slaves, untouchable caste, and Yazidis, and their condition is double that of hegemonic masculinities and femininities from their slave, untouchable caste, Yazidis.

As you know, I joined MHRD in 2011[iv] and am looking for students and their background ideologies and ways of life. I met everyone from the Asia-Pacific region in this class. Our teachers are Jewish, Sikh, and white. MHRD is a Jewish-dominated department. As you know, Jews were the victims of the holocaust. Not now. We have a sociological concept that victims will become killers. We can apply this concept to Jewish ideology. The Jewish selection committee selected hegemonic castes like Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya, and Shudra, who are known for crimes against humanity in India, Nepal and Diaspora. They selected sexual minorities from hegemonic backgrounds. They selected me too, even though my English language skills are not good. The Asian-Pacific sexual minorities never feel dehumanized because they are not born victims like blacks, untouchable castes, or Yazidi sexual minorities. From the start, there was no Yazidi in the MHRD classroom. Everyone is a Muslim with a full burqa background. They are just like any Brahmin or Kshatriya Hindu student. But they are all well-versed in English. How can an untouchable like me or a Yazidi who was never allowed to learn, read, speak, listen, or who was never allowed to attend school in India and Nepal for 6000 years speak or write or listen or read English by Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, Shudras, Khans, sayyads, Siddarthas, Mahavieers, Singhs? MHRD selects only Hindu Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras and selects only dominant Muslim clans and Buddhist clans from the Asia-Pacific region because they know that if they select any black or untouchable caste or Yazidi sexual minorities or black or untouchable caste or Yazidis, then our entire class will be focusing on core issues like human status slavery, racism, casteism, dehumanization, sub-humanization, brutal genocidal persecution etc, which the Jewish or white community or UNO or EU does not like. Liberating victims from an age-old institution is not the policy of any global human rights body[v]. Actually, for example, super-imposing racism, casteism, untouchability, and genderism is the policy of the UNO, EU, and global human rights bodies, just like the Indian state has a policy of super-imposing racism, casteism, untouchability, and genderism in our times. Nowhere in UNO or its agencies' history of trying to liberate traditional socio-religious-cultural victims from Hindu, Islam, Sikh, Jain, Parsi, and whites religions, i.e., black or untouchable caste or Yazidis, I observed Indian and Nepali MHRD students from 2010 till today. They are all Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, Khans, Sayyads, Siddarthas, Mahavieers, Singhs.

They are all members of Hindu terrorist organizations in India and Nepal. The irony is that the global campus of a human rights ally in Nepal, i.e., Kathmandu Law School[vi], is a notorious Hindu Brahmin law school with traditional, harmful, reproducing Brahmin superiority over non-Brahmin communities. Brahmin superiority means white superiority, which means Jewish superiority. So the global campus of human rights is filled with whites, Jews, and Brahmins, or sexual minorities of whites, Jews, and Brahmins. It all looks radical, but the reality is that everyone is white, Jewish, Brahmin, Khan, Sayyad, Mahavir, Siddartha, Singh, etc. If there was one untouchable like me, then they knew how to remove me from their degree. They used plagiarism as a reason to remove me from their degree but left 17 students to graduate with the MHRD degree. I have not even plagiarized my assignments from the beginning. It is the last assignment at the end of the semester. What about students who kept on plagiarizing from the beginning but graduated softly? One of my fellow gay friends was shocked and told me almost all of our Asia-Pacific students plagiarized their assignments like every MHRD student, but they were passed softly, except you, because you are fighting and fighting against the entire MHRD whitish skins and their white masks in classrooms. You are not even leaving our Jewish teachers. How can a person teach human rights when she takes a bribe from her student(Mr. Ravi Prakash Vyas)? He brought a gift from India and gave it to his Jewish teachers. He showed me his gift by saying that his father had sent it to his MHRD Jewish teachers as a gift. Taking or giving a gift is a bribe. I don’t know how many Asian-Pacific students are bringing gifts to the teachers of their human rights, but it is a culture of Indian and Nepali society to bribe their teachers in the name of Guru Dakshina. I am not exempted from it. For thousands of years, Brahmin teachers in India made it a habit to bribe them. Untouchable students are forced to give gifts to Brahmins in India. A gift has no untouchability because it is a money, material, value. Even in the West, our Indian and Nepali Brahmin or Hindu students bribe the community of their human rights. A bribe is a bribe across time and space.

 Mr. Ravi Prakash Vyas and his father studied MHRD degrees for 100 thousand dollars at no cost. How come two people from a family can get a scholarship? Isn't it corruption? Mr. Ravi Prakash Vyas and his father and Nepali MHRD students are hardcore members of Hindu terrorist organizations and born human rights violators. If you apply a lie detector on them, you will get shocking news about their inhuman behavior towards untouchable castes in Nepal and India. They are agents of age-old systems, but overnight they became human rights' faces with MHRD scholarship. The irony is that these Indian and Nepali Brahmin and Kshatriya or Hindu human rights students oppose any scholarships and reservations for untouchable students in their home countries but use the same reservations and scholarships in western countries.

Recently, I have seen an announcement from the University of Gottingen that an applicant in Indian studies should be from any marginalized caste. They understood that these Hindus or Muslims or Buddhists are cheating them in the name of human rights and democratization, so they directly announced to take only marginalized caste background students because they know that untouchable castes are born human rights fighters, whereas white, Jewish, Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya, Shudra, Khan, Sayyad, Mahavir, Siddartha, and Singh are corrupted human rights applicants. Although the Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung does not provide full scholarships, untouchable castes are still applying under self-funding and studying human rights, in contrast to UNO-funded, EU-funded MHRD Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya, Shudra, Khan, Sayyad, Mahavir, Siddartha, and Singh students. Ask them to apply for human rights studies without any scholarship and you will be shocked. Nobody will apply for your human rights and democratization studies. They are applying and studying for your MHRD or human rights for the sake of your full scholarship. One of the untouchable Chamar or Madiga caste Indian Police Service (IPS) officers went to study human rights with his own salary money. He never grabbed any scholarship, whereas Mr. Ravi Prakash Vyas Brahmin's father, who was also an Indian police official, grabbed scholarships meant for students who were not earning. Every Brahmin, every Kshatriya, every Gupta, and every Reddy is a corrupted human rights face.

Ravi Prakash Vyas[vii] and his Indian and Nepali Brahmin community strongly believe in and worship the Sanskrit language, which divided humans in the name of the Hindu religion, which has a strong vertical caste hierarchy through which untouchability and racism operate. The Kathmandu Law School is full of caste-practicing, untouchability-practicing, race-practicing, and Sanskrit-glorifying Brahmins like Ravi Prakash Vyas and his father. How can you achieve human rights when you have these thieves and terrorists in the room of human rights and democratization?

If you look at their Facebook, Twitter, or other social media, you will notice that they never focus on core issues other than some glorifying issues. They are Brahmin-skinned, white-masked or Khan-skinned, white-masked human rights faces in the United Nations, the European Union, the Global Campus of Human Rights, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, UNHCR, and other organizations. Beware of these Janus faces. They are plundering the world in the name of human rights and democratization by reproducing age-old ideologies. They represent our lived experiences without any lived experience. Reject them. If you see any human rights representative without a victim background, reject them loudly. Declare them loudly. You are a Brahmin person; you are a Khan person; you are a Brahmin person; you are a Kshatriya person; human rights do not mask you.

You can put them under a lie detector to find out their real face. They are members of global human rights at the global level, whereas they are members of Hindu terrorist organizations (BJP, RSS, VHP, Shiva Sena, Sri Ram Sena, ISCON, Swami Vivekananda, Bharatha Mata, Vandemataram, Janaganamana, etc ) at the India and Nepal level. The same is true for students and teachers from Muslim, Buddhist, Sikh, Jain, Parsi, and Jewish backgrounds. The Kathmandu Law School is a Hindu terrorist organization filled with only Brahmins[viii] and their aged ideologies[ix]. Because they are agents of age-old systems, how can a global human rights body, the EU, or the UN, make allies of them? White, Jew, Brahmin, or Khan all sought hegemony in the name of human rights and democracy by corrupting global resources in the name of human rights, which is now bursting[x].

The entire process of selection, policy, recruitment, scholarships, and teaching, studying global human rights and democratization very much consists of corruption. Indeed, it is a crime against humanity and a global corruption in the name of human rights and democratization to super-impose their everyday hegemonies.

Everyone is a hegemony. How can you run human rights successfully?[xi]

Finally, our everyday radical social change ideology, practice, behavior, way of life, ideology, groups, communities, and personal and family background are very important to our work as human rights activists, teachers, students, and scholars. I was born to inter-caste parents. My mother is a Yadav and my father is untouchable. I married an Ethiopian. My son is from Ethiopia, whereas my unborn child was killed in India in the name of honor by her Hindu-Kapu caste grandparents, but I now have a son from Ethiopia. In other words, Hindu, Muslim, Buddhist, Sikh, Jain, Parsi, are unsuitable for any progressive fund because their daily lives constitute a crime against humanity. Did you have an untouchable in your family? Did you have any Africans in your family? Did you marry an untouchable? Did you marry a black wo/man? Did you marry a Yazidi? Did you have a Yazidi in your family? Is one of your parents untouchable or a negro or yazidi or sexual minority? All these questions are hard for Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, Sikhs, Jains, and Parsees since they persecute untouchables, Negroes, sexual minorities, and Yazidis in their everyday lives. Reject them all. They are gang-rapping progressive ideologies and plundering international funds in the name of human rights[xii] and democratization.

My final moral question to these Indian and Nepalese skins and human rights masks is, are you really fit for a human rights job when you are a born human rights violator? For how long will you corrupt the globe? 

Dr.Suryaraju Mattimalla Why I Am Not Indian: The Untouchable Rejecting India's Citizenship

 


Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)