Tuesday 17 May 2022

State of Critics in a Democratic Indian State-Dr.Suryaraju Mattimalla


 

 

State of Critics in a Democratic Indian State-Dr.Suryaraju Mattimalla

According to the Constitution of India, India is a democratic country. Its democratic claims are glorified by entire global agencies such as the United Nations Organization, European Union, United States of America, BBC, CNN, Nobel Prize, Amnesty, Human Rights Watch, 1951 Refugee convention, etc.

India has been a democratic state for more than 70 years and the country has achieved every democratic principle and value theoretically and practically. This is the conclusion of western powers and their mainstream progressive media about successive Indian democratic states. Western forces consider India to be the world's most successful democratic state and society. India has become the safest country in the world where lives are protected, safeguarded, and guarded by the democratic state and civil society. India has become a green zone in the eyes of the above states and organizations. India has become a role model for democratic values on earth. Finally, western states and their agencies concluded that India is their best in promoting democratic values in totalitarian countries outside the west and India, such as Africa, Islamic, and other parts of Asia.

In this way, India became another western state in establishing democratic principles in the eyes of western forces and its progressive media. This is the conclusion reached by western states and their agencies regarding the Indian state and its civil society. They have concluded that India is beyond criticism or any question related to any human rights violations since Indians are democratic like their Indian State theoretically and practically. India fulfills democratic values theoretically and practically locally, regionally, nationally, and internationally.

The Indian community became agents of human rights, peace, equality, liberty, freedom, knowledge, humanity, kindness, equity, and rationality. This is the ideology of argumentative Indians across time and space about their country and society. In this way, India achieved equality for its people in socio-cultural-religious-economic-political aspects of the country. There is nothing to question about India or Indians since they civilized their society and state beyond any doubt or question about practicing their greatest human values in their everyday life with fellow human beings. India has abolished vertical caste hierarchies, brutal violence against untouchable castes, and equal respect, dignity, and value in the Indian state and society, so there is nothing to suspect or think about beyond India. Indian is a civilized human being in his or her democratic Indian state.

As a dark-skinned Indian untouchable for more than 40 years, I heard, read, and listened to the above opinions about the Indian state and its civil society for decades and decades till film critic and theorist Kathi Mahesh was killed by notorious Pawan Kalyan's fans for questioning his everyday corruption, non-meritorious cinema action, political plots, brutal violence, his lack of knowledge over socio-political-secular, democratic-constitutional knowledge, etc.

I started watching film critic Kathi Mahesh's YouTube interviews with various TV channels about constitutional morality, democracy, religion, human values, corruption, plots, political ideologies, citizenship, rationality, science, freedom, and individuality very courageously without fear of any feudal lords, cinema producers, directors, heroes, or heroines. Generally, the Indian film industry is filled with family trees from the same caste, families, religions, and races without any merit. The Indian cinema industry is a private industry without knowing the meaning of merit.

Kathi Mahesh, with a vast knowledge of theoretical skills in English and Telugu, started writing film reviews critically about various core issues such as caste, untouchability, religion, jingoism, nationalism, patriot, corruption, and the failure of Indian democracy by feudal lords of the Indian ruling castes.

Naturally, Indian film actors belong to dominant Hindu castes, who are actors cum politicians and are known for open corruption, brutal violence, and primitive ideologies across time and space. They are well-known for killing and raping lower-caste untouchables in their villages. Every Indian film actor or maker is part of this brutal violence against untouchable castes that is being focused on by theoretical scholar Kathi Mahesh. After hearing his YouTube speeches or published reviews, I concluded that even so-called theoretical scholars from CSCS, CSSS, CSDS, JNU, or Nobel Prize winners are not even equal to Kathi Mahesh's thoughts and writings. He is a theoretician without affiliation with any so-called academic institution. He started writing, publishing, and expressing his opinions openly on TV channels and in journals without fear of life and death. He is the first theorist to talk openly against feudal cinema actors, particularly in the Telugu cinema industry. He writes very critically about the non-meritorious actions of these family trees, such as NTR, ANR, Chiranjivi, etc. He openly speaks against their non-meritorious cinematic actions. He talks about merit and non-merit very openly in the private sector.

As I am aware, the private sector is filled with non-meritorious people since they are recruited by family members and their caste and religious people. Hence, the private sector is the best example of non-merit. Private educational institutions, medical colleges, engineering colleges, law colleges, the cinema industry, etc., are the best examples of producing non-meritorious or unproductive people in India. They all have private academic certificates, have moved to every western country, and are employed by NASA, Cambridge University, western universities, and western governments. According to a written interview conducted, the public sector in India is doing somewhat better than the private sector. It does not mean the public industry is better than the private industry. They are more or less the same, but the private sector is worse than the public sector in terms of merit.

Kathi Mahesh is a theorist with the most rational thinking, writing, arguing, and publishing in the public sphere. He is a media person and represents modernity against any traditional voices. He is known as the Indian Noam Chomsky in terms of critical thinking and rationality by progressive thinkers.  He is best known for his most incisive rational critique of Hindu religious repressive ideology. He began writing film reviews on Pawan Kalyan, another branch of Chiranjivi's family tree, without regard for merit, moral values, or human values. He is known for massive corruption, non-meritorious, lack of basic knowledge, violence, rape, killing, threatening weaker sections, being a casteist and racist person like any Indian cinema actor.

Every Indian film actor is joining politics in order to amass wealth and add to their unrecorded billions of dollars of properties in Swiss banks. India is a leading country in the Swiss Bank. Officially, we have hundreds of billionaires, but unofficially, we have millions of billionaires in India and Swiss bank. Every Indian film actor, like Indian politicians, is part of international economic crimes apart from crimes against humanity. With his vast theoretical knowledge and speeches, Kathi Mahesh began questioning Pawan Kalyan and other non-meritorious film actors in the media as well as in journals, in contrast to Indian Nobel laureates or theorists, who never dared to speak about corruption or caste-based violence in public spheres or the media, because they themselves practice inhuman caste system, untouchability, racism, xenophobia, corruption, cheating, recommendations, and so on. They are the practitioners of crimes against humanity, so that none of the Indian Nobel prize winners or theorists talk against crimes against humanity, where Kathi Mahesh started his voice against crimes against humanity.

Telugu cinema actors, along with Bollywood actors and their ruling castes, including their fans, who are best known for killing and raping women, joined together and eliminated the most courageous but truthful Kathi Mahesh from the earth. Kathi Mahesh was murdered by Pawan Kalyan fans but manipulated as a road accident. We all know that he is going to be killed by Pawan Kalyan's notorious fans. Freedom of expression has been silenced by Indian casteists, racists, jingoists, nationalists, Hindutva forces, and corrupted minds. Before killing the theorist, he was harassed by the Telugu cinema community physically and mentally and humiliated, threatened, and maimed for life by Pawan Kalyan and his notorious fans, who are known for brutal ideologies against humanity.

None of the Indian theorists were ever threatened or killed by anyone because they belong to the Hindu caste, whereas Kathi Mahewas belong to the untouchable caste to which I belong. Hindu theorists and activists are safe but not untouchable writers, scholars, theorists, or activists. This is the life of democratic India. The Indian state and its civil society openly practice a brutal caste system, untouchability, and racism against the country's 250 million untouchables, people of dark skin, and Africans. The Hindu Diaspora practices the same inhuman ideologies against Africans as in western countries. The West's pet language of democracy, constitution, safe zone, peace, yoga, meditation, spirituality, love, Bhagavad Gita, temples, Aryan, swastika, marriage systems, family systems, and Bollywood of Indian identities are carrying the spirit of 6000-year-old brutal Hindutva ideologies against untouchable castes in general and untouchable caste intellectuals in particular. Kathi Mahesh was killed by Pawan Kalyan, but who will arrest him? We can make and produce 9 billion corrupted Pawan Kalyan's, or NTRs, or ANRs, or Chiranjivis, but can we make or produce a theorist like Kathi Mahesh? The theory has been physically eliminated by empirical Hindutva forces in India.

Long live Indian democracy and its feudalism.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment