The Violent Buddhist Moral Philosophy

 

Philosopher Slavoj Zizek concluded that Buddhism is the most violent religion, just like Hinduism or Islam. In addition, Evan Thomson's book "Why I Am Not a Buddhist" was published by Yale University Press and concluded the same about Buddhism. Most radical philosophers, scholars, and writers have rejected Buddhism in any form. However, the Mahars and Malas of India are still following Ambedkar’s Neo-Buddhism, at least for material benefits. Are you still with them, or what is your position on the Ambedkarites on this matter?

If you live in any Buddhist country, then you will come to know how much it is violent towards untouchables.

Do you know that Buddhist countries have a strict caste system and practice untouchability on untouchables?

 Ambedkarites, Mahars, Malas, and Neo-Buddhists should read global philosophy, or at the very least, serious Buddhist works, without relying on what Ambedkar said.It is his opinion on Buddhism. But progressive and radical philosophers, as mentioned in my above message, have correctly concluded that Buddhist moral philosophy and Gandhian ideology are more violent than Hitler's. I pity the Ambedkarites and their lack of access to reading materials.I know this is survival politics, but in knowledge production, survival politics has no place in the long run.